Trump says ‘there are methods’ for seeking a third term, adding that he’s ‘not joking’

CNN - Mar 30th, 2025

President Donald Trump recently hinted at pursuing a third term in the White House, despite the constitutional prohibition under the 22nd Amendment. In an interview with NBC News' Kristen Welker, Trump mentioned that there are 'methods' to achieve this and emphasized that he was 'not joking' about the possibility. Although he did not provide details, Trump acknowledged that many people want him to consider this option. The interview also highlighted a potential plan where Vice President JD Vance might run in 2028 and later 'pass the baton' to Trump.

The implications of such a move are significant, as the 22nd Amendment clearly limits presidents to two terms. Steve Bannon, a close ally, argued that the amendment does not specify consecutive terms, potentially opening a loophole. Additionally, Rep. Andy Ogles has proposed legislation to modify the amendment, allowing nonconsecutive third terms. However, changing the amendment would require substantial legislative and state-level support. As Trump nears the end of his second term, discussions on this topic continue to spark debate about presidential term limits and their impact on American democracy.

Donald Trump Jd Vance Steve Bannon Andy Ogles 22nd Amendment Presidential Term Limits Us Constitution

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.6

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article effectively captures a controversial and timely topic, discussing the possibility of a third presidential term for Donald Trump. It provides a clear narrative and engages readers with its provocative subject matter. However, the piece could benefit from a more balanced presentation by including additional expert opinions and a deeper exploration of the legal challenges involved. While the article accurately references key facts, such as the 22nd Amendment, it lacks comprehensive analysis of the feasibility and implications of Trump's claims. Overall, it serves as a starting point for discussion but requires further exploration to fully inform readers about the complexities of amending presidential term limits.

Accuracy

The story accurately references the 22nd Amendment, stating it prohibits a president from being elected more than twice. The claim that Trump did not dismiss the idea of pursuing a third term is consistent with his past public statements. However, the article's assertion that there are 'methods' to achieve a third term lacks specific evidence or legal feasibility, which requires verification. The mention of Rep. Andy Ogles' proposal is accurate, but the likelihood of such legislation passing is not addressed, leaving readers without full context on its feasibility.

Balance

The article presents both Trump's perspective and that of his critics, such as Michael Waldman, who dismisses the possibility of a third term as illegal. However, the piece could benefit from more voices, particularly from constitutional scholars or legal experts, to provide a more balanced view of the legal challenges involved. The article leans slightly towards sensationalism by emphasizing Trump's claim without adequately exploring the broader legal and political implications.

Clarity

The article is written in clear and straightforward language, making it accessible to a general audience. It logically presents the sequence of events and statements, ensuring readers can follow the narrative. However, the article could be improved by providing more detailed explanations of the legal processes involved in amending the Constitution, which would enhance comprehension.

Source quality

The article cites statements from Trump, Rep. Andy Ogles, and Michael Waldman, providing a mix of political and legal perspectives. While these sources are credible, the article would benefit from additional authoritative sources, such as constitutional law experts, to enhance its reliability. The inclusion of Steve Bannon's viewpoint adds a political dimension but may introduce bias, given his close association with Trump.

Transparency

The article provides some context, such as the historical background of the 22nd Amendment and Trump's previous statements about a third term. However, it lacks transparency regarding the methodology or criteria for evaluating the feasibility of Trump's claims. The absence of detailed legal analysis or expert opinions on constitutional amendments limits the reader's understanding of the complexities involved.