The idea of Trump circumventing the Constitution to seek a third term should make us 'shiver'

Los Angeles Times - Apr 11th, 2025

Several letters to the editor highlight concerns about former President Donald Trump's hints at seeking a third presidential term, which would challenge the 22nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Writers express fears over Trump's previous attempts to contest election results and the potential weakening of institutional checks and balances, should he push for a third term. The letters draw parallels between Trump’s actions and those of historical dictators, underlining the threat such ambitions pose to American democracy.

The broader context of the discussion revolves around the perceived erosion of democratic norms and the role of various governmental institutions in upholding constitutional limits. The letters reflect a deep division among the public and underline the importance of vigilance in protecting democratic principles. Given the current political climate, with a conservative-leaning Supreme Court and Trump loyalists in key government positions, the implications of these discussions are especially significant. The situation prompts a critical examination of how American institutions can respond to potential challenges to constitutional boundaries.

Donald Trump Election Integrity American Democracy U.S. Constitution 22nd Amendment Presidential Term Limits

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

4.6

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article presents a timely and controversial topic that is of significant public interest, particularly concerning democratic norms and presidential term limits. However, its reliance on opinion rather than authoritative analysis limits its accuracy and source quality. The lack of balance and transparency further affects its ability to provide a comprehensive view of the issue. While the article is generally readable and has the potential to engage readers, its speculative nature and lack of depth may limit its overall impact. The discussion about a potential third term for Trump is likely to provoke debate and controversy, making it a relevant but polarizing piece.

Accuracy

The article's accuracy is mixed, as it contains both factual elements and speculative claims. The 22nd Amendment's restriction on presidential terms is accurately mentioned, but the suggestion that Trump could run for a third term is speculative and not supported by constitutional law. The references to Trump's past actions, such as inciting an insurrection, are factual but require context and verification. The comparison to historical figures like Roosevelt is accurate but not directly relevant to the current political situation. Overall, the article blends verified facts with speculative interpretations, which affects its accuracy.

Balance

The article lacks balance, as it predominantly presents perspectives critical of Trump without offering counterarguments or alternative viewpoints. The letters to the editor overwhelmingly express concern about Trump seeking a third term, with little representation of differing opinions or defenses of his actions. This one-sided presentation limits the article's ability to provide a comprehensive view of the issue. By not including voices that might argue for the possibility or legality of a third term, the article fails to achieve a balanced presentation.

Clarity

The article is relatively clear in its language and structure, with each letter to the editor presenting a distinct viewpoint. The tone is informal and opinionated, reflecting the personal nature of the letters. However, the lack of a cohesive narrative or clear transitions between points can make it difficult for readers to follow the overall argument. The article could benefit from a more structured presentation that clearly distinguishes between factual information and opinion.

Source quality

The article's source quality is limited, as it primarily consists of letters to the editor rather than expert analysis or authoritative sources. These letters reflect personal opinions and interpretations rather than verified facts or informed commentary. The lack of citations or references to credible sources weakens the article's reliability and authority. By relying on subjective opinions, the article does not provide a strong foundation for its claims, which affects its overall credibility.

Transparency

The article exhibits moderate transparency, as it clearly presents the opinions of various individuals through letters to the editor. However, it lacks transparency in terms of explaining the basis for some claims, such as the feasibility of a third term or the legal interpretations of the 22nd Amendment. The article does not disclose any conflicts of interest or provide context for the opinions expressed, which limits the reader's ability to fully understand the motivations behind the claims.