A Deadly Asteroid May Strike Earth In 2032 — What To Know

Forbes - Feb 2nd, 2025

A newly discovered near-Earth asteroid, 2024 YR4, as wide as the Statue of Liberty is tall, has prompted a rare warning from the International Asteroid Warning Network, chaired by NASA. This Apollo-type asteroid crosses Earth's orbit and is rated Level 3 on the Torino Impact Hazard Scale, indicating a 1.3% chance of collision with Earth in 2032. While this probability might seem low, it is significant enough for astronomers to take seriously, necessitating further data collection through deep space radar and thermal infrared observations until its next observability in 2028. NASA and other agencies are considering mitigation strategies as they await more refined orbit information.

The discovery of 2024 YR4 brings to mind past concerns over asteroid Apophis, initially deemed a potential threat with a 2.7% chance of hitting Earth in the coming decades. Though NASA ruled out these risks in 2021, simulations have renewed some worries. Apophis will make a close approach in 2029, passing nearer than geostationary satellites. These developments underscore the ongoing challenges in tracking and mitigating asteroid threats, emphasizing the critical need for continued observation and preparedness to protect Earth from potential impacts.

Nasa International Asteroid Warning Network 2024 Yr4 Asteroid Apophis Asteroid Impact Torino Impact Hazard Scale Space Observation Mitigation Strategies

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article effectively communicates the potential risks associated with asteroid 2024 YR4 and the scientific efforts to monitor it. It is timely and of considerable public interest, given the global implications of asteroid impacts. While generally accurate and clear, the article would benefit from greater transparency and source attribution to enhance its credibility. The balance of perspectives is adequate, though additional expert insights could provide a more comprehensive view. Overall, the story is engaging and informative, successfully capturing the reader's attention while highlighting the importance of ongoing scientific research in planetary defense.

Accuracy

The article is largely accurate, providing specific details about asteroid 2024 YR4 and its potential impact risk. It correctly identifies the asteroid as an Apollo-type and provides a plausible orbit period of four years. The 1.3% collision probability and Level 3 rating on the Torino Scale are consistent with known data, indicating a serious but not immediate threat. However, the claim about the asteroid's visibility and the need for further observations until 2028 requires more precise verification from authoritative sources. The comparison with asteroid Apophis is accurate, though it lacks updated insights on recent simulations.

Balance

The article maintains balance by presenting both the potential risks and the scientific efforts to mitigate those risks. It discusses the historical context of similar asteroids like Apophis, providing a comprehensive view of the situation. However, it could improve by including more perspectives from different scientific communities or experts, which would offer a broader range of viewpoints and potentially reduce any perceived bias towards sensationalism.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, presenting information in a logical sequence. It uses straightforward language that is accessible to a general audience. However, some technical terms, such as the Torino Impact Hazard Scale, could be better explained for readers unfamiliar with the subject matter. Overall, the article effectively communicates the key points without overwhelming the reader with jargon.

Source quality

The article does not explicitly cite its sources, which affects its credibility. While it references organizations like NASA and the International Asteroid Warning Network, it lacks direct quotes or links to official reports or statements. Including such sources would enhance the article's reliability and provide readers with the opportunity to verify the information independently.

Transparency

The article provides some context about the asteroid's potential impact and the scientific measures needed for further study. However, it lacks transparency in its methodology and does not disclose how the information was gathered or which experts were consulted. Greater transparency about the sources and methods used to obtain the data would improve the article's trustworthiness.