Trade war escalates as China raises retaliatory tariffs on US goods to 125%

Apnews - Apr 11th, 2025

China announced an increase in tariffs on U.S. goods from 84% to 125%, effective Saturday, intensifying the trade war between the two largest global economies. This move follows U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to raise tariffs on Chinese imports to a total of 145% while pausing tariffs for other countries. China's Finance Ministry criticized the U.S. actions as 'economic bullying' and pledged to counter these with its own measures, including filing a lawsuit with the World Trade Organization. The ongoing tariff exchanges have alarmed markets, with fears of a potential U.S. recession and global economic slowdown.

The trade conflict between the U.S. and China, involving significant imports such as soybeans, aircraft, electronics, and industrial equipment, poses substantial threats to the global economic outlook. The World Trade Organization's head, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, warned of severe damage to the economic forecast. Meanwhile, the tariffs could lead to increased consumer prices and impact businesses, while Trump's strategy aims to boost U.S. manufacturing jobs—a goal that may take years to achieve. The geopolitical tension underscores the complexity and potential fallout of the trade war on global markets and economies.

Donald Trump China U.S. Tariffs Trade War World Trade Organization Global Economy

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.6

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a comprehensive overview of the recent developments in the U.S.-China trade war, with a strong focus on the latest tariff changes and their immediate implications. It scores highly in timeliness and public interest, given the ongoing relevance of the topic. The article is largely accurate and clear, supported by credible sources, although it could benefit from a wider range of perspectives and more detailed analysis of economic impacts. While the article effectively engages readers and addresses a controversial issue, it could further enhance its impact by incorporating expert opinions and exploring potential long-term outcomes. Overall, the article is a well-structured and informative piece that successfully communicates the complexities of international trade tensions.

Accuracy

The article is largely accurate, providing a clear account of the recent developments in the U.S.-China trade war. The claim that China has raised tariffs on U.S. goods from 84% to 125% is corroborated by multiple sources. Additionally, the assertion that U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods now total 145% is supported by external reports. However, the article could benefit from more detailed verification of the exact goods affected and the specific economic impacts, which are broadly stated without precise figures or expert analysis.

Balance

The article presents multiple perspectives, including those of the Chinese government and U.S. officials. However, it leans slightly towards highlighting the negative impacts of U.S. tariffs, using terms like 'economic bullying' and 'joke in the history of the world economy,' which are direct quotes from Chinese sources. While it does mention the potential for U.S. job creation, the article could provide a more balanced view by exploring potential benefits of the tariffs from a U.S. economic perspective.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and uses clear, straightforward language that makes it accessible to a general audience. It logically presents the sequence of events and uses quotes effectively to convey the perspectives of different stakeholders. The tone remains neutral, which aids in clear comprehension, although slightly more context could enhance understanding of complex economic terms.

Source quality

The article relies on credible sources such as statements from the Chinese Finance Ministry and references to the World Trade Organization, lending authority to its claims. However, it would benefit from a wider range of sources, such as economic analysts or independent experts, to provide a more comprehensive view of the situation. The reliance on official statements, while credible, may limit the depth of analysis.

Transparency

The article provides some context for the trade war and its implications but lacks detailed explanations of its methodology or the basis for certain claims, such as the specific economic impacts on global markets. The article could improve transparency by explaining how tariff rates are calculated or by providing more background on the historical context of the trade war.