China urges US to 'completely cancel' tariffs

BBC - Apr 13th, 2025

Chinese officials have urged President Donald Trump to completely cancel reciprocal tariffs as tensions in the trade war between the United States and China continue to escalate. Despite a 90-day pause on a variety of global tariffs, Trump has increased tariffs on Chinese imports to 145%. While the Trump administration has offered concessions by exempting certain technological products from tariffs, China has dismissed these as minor steps and continues to evaluate the situation. Both nations have been engaged in a tit-for-tat tariff battle, with China imposing retaliatory tariffs on US goods, raising rates progressively to reach 125% as of Saturday.

The ongoing trade war is a significant global economic event, affecting industries and consumers worldwide. Trump's administration argues that tariffs are a tool to negotiate more favorable trade terms and address perceived unfairness in the global trading system. The exemptions on tech products aim to mitigate concerns from tech companies and consumers about rising prices. However, there appears to be no immediate resolution in sight, with the US and China maintaining protectionist stances. The situation is further complicated by US tariffs linked to efforts to curb the flow of fentanyl from China. The trade conflict underscores the broader geopolitical tensions between the two economic powerhouses, with implications for global trade dynamics and economic policies.

Trump China Tariffs Us China Relations Trade War Reciprocal Tariffs Global Economy Technology Exemptions

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.0

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides a timely and relevant overview of the ongoing trade tensions between the US and China, focusing on recent developments in tariff policies. It effectively highlights the public interest and potential impact of these issues on global markets and consumer prices. However, the story could benefit from greater balance by including diverse perspectives and expert analysis. The factual accuracy is generally strong, but some claims require further verification and attribution to enhance credibility. The article is clear and accessible, though it could provide more context for complex terms and figures. Overall, the story succeeds in informing readers about a significant international issue but has room for improvement in source quality and transparency.

Accuracy

The story presents several factual claims, such as the Chinese officials' request for the US to cancel reciprocal tariffs and the specifics of tariff rates imposed by both the US and China. These claims are generally supported by reliable sources, but there are areas needing verification. For instance, the exact tariff rates of 145% by the US and 125% by China should be cross-verified with official announcements or credible reports. Additionally, the story's mention of technological product exemptions aligns with known concessions, but the scope of these exemptions requires precise confirmation. The statement about the lack of communication plans between Trump and Xi Jinping is consistent with available information, but it is crucial to verify this through official channels or credible news outlets.

Balance

The article primarily presents the perspectives of the US and Chinese governments, focusing on their respective actions and responses in the trade war. While it mentions the US administration's view of tariffs as a negotiating tactic, it lacks a deeper exploration of China's strategic intentions or the broader economic implications for other countries. The story could benefit from including more diverse viewpoints, such as those from economic experts, affected industries, or international trade organizations, to provide a more balanced perspective on the issue.

Clarity

The article is generally clear in its language and structure, making it accessible to readers with a basic understanding of international trade issues. It logically presents the sequence of events and the positions of the US and Chinese governments. However, some complex terms and figures, such as the specific tariff rates, could benefit from further explanation or context to aid comprehension. The tone remains neutral, focusing on factual reporting without emotive language.

Source quality

The story references statements from Chinese officials and the US administration, which are primary sources in this context. However, it lacks attribution to specific individuals or documents that could enhance credibility. The absence of direct quotes from senior officials or references to detailed reports diminishes the source quality. Including insights from recognized economic analysts or trade experts would improve the depth and reliability of the reporting.

Transparency

The article provides limited context about the methodology used to gather the information, such as how the statements were obtained or the basis for the tariff rate figures. There is no disclosure of potential conflicts of interest, and while the story outlines the main claims, it lacks an explanation of the underlying data or sources that support these claims. Greater transparency about the information-gathering process and the inclusion of source material would enhance the article's credibility.