Oppo’s Find X8 Ultra squeezes better specs into a slightly thinner phone

The Verge - Apr 10th, 2025

Oppo has launched the Find X8 Ultra, a new contender in the competitive camera phone market dominated by Oppo, Xiaomi, and Vivo. Unlike its rivals, which are producing larger devices, Oppo's latest release focuses on achieving a balance between size and performance. The Find X8 Ultra features a 6.82-inch display and is thinner than its competitors, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra and Vivo X100 Ultra, while still packing a powerful camera system with four 50-megapixel rear lenses tuned by Hasselblad. Additionally, it includes advanced features like a dedicated haptic shutter button and impressive battery capabilities with 100W wired and 50W wireless charging.

The launch of the Find X8 Ultra, alongside the Find X8s and X8s Plus, signifies Oppo's strategic decision to prioritize a more manageable size without sacrificing high-end specifications. This approach could redefine consumer expectations in the camera phone segment, as users seek devices that offer both portability and top-tier photography features. However, the new Find X8 models will only be available in China, highlighting a regional focus in Oppo's marketing strategy. The introduction of these phones could potentially influence the design and development decisions of other manufacturers in the camera phone market, as they address the growing demand for practicality alongside cutting-edge technology.

Snapdragon 8 Elite Xiaomi Oppo Find X8 Ultra Camera Phones Vivo Hasselblad Media Tek Dimensity 9400 Plus

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a comprehensive overview of the Oppo Find X8 Ultra, highlighting its competitive features and positioning within the smartphone market. It excels in clarity and timeliness, presenting information in a straightforward manner that is relevant to current tech industry discussions. However, the lack of explicit source citations and transparency about the basis of its claims detracts from its overall reliability. The article could also benefit from a more balanced exploration of the phone's potential limitations and a broader context of its market impact. Despite these areas for improvement, it effectively engages readers interested in smartphone technology and innovation.

Accuracy

The article provides a generally accurate overview of the Oppo Find X8 Ultra, detailing its specifications such as the 6.82-inch display, 8.78mm thickness, and 6,100mAh battery. These details align with known specifications from credible sources. Additionally, the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and the camera setup with four 50-megapixel rear lenses are correctly described. However, the claim about the phone being thinner than competitors like the Xiaomi 15 Ultra and Vivo X100 Ultra requires verification through direct comparison with those models. The article accurately notes the absence of plans for an international launch, which aligns with Oppo's current market strategy. While factual, the article could benefit from additional verification of the camera's real-world performance and battery life claims.

Balance

The article maintains a balanced perspective by providing a comparative analysis of the Oppo Find X8 Ultra against its competitors, Xiaomi and Vivo. It highlights both the strengths of the Oppo device, such as its thinner profile and large battery, and the competitive landscape in which it operates. However, it leans slightly towards emphasizing Oppo's innovations without equally discussing potential drawbacks or limitations of the device. The lack of international availability is mentioned but not explored in depth, which could provide a more balanced view of the phone's market impact.

Clarity

The article is written in a clear and concise manner, making it easy for readers to understand the key features and competitive context of the Oppo Find X8 Ultra. The language is straightforward, and the structure logically presents the phone's specifications, design features, and market positioning. However, the article could benefit from more detailed explanations of technical terms, such as 'periscopes' and 'IP ratings,' to aid readers who may not be familiar with these concepts.

Source quality

The article does not explicitly cite sources for its information, which affects the perceived reliability and credibility of the content. While the details align with known specifications from reputable tech news outlets, the absence of direct attributions or links to primary sources, such as official Oppo announcements or expert reviews, limits the depth of source quality. Including a variety of authoritative sources would enhance the article's credibility and provide readers with a clearer context for the claims made.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in terms of disclosing the basis for its claims and the methodology used to gather information. There is no mention of potential conflicts of interest or the author's relationship with Oppo, which could affect the impartiality of the reporting. Greater transparency about the sources of information and any affiliations would improve the article's trustworthiness and help readers better understand the context and potential biases.