‘Monster Hunter Wilds’ Is Putting Up ‘Baldur’s Gate 3’ Post-Launch Numbers

Forbes - Mar 16th, 2025

Monster Hunter Wilds, a recent release by Capcom, is experiencing immense success, echoing the popularity of Baldur’s Gate 3. Two weeks after its launch, the game maintains a strong player base, with approximately 650,000 concurrent players nightly. This figure surpasses Baldur’s Gate 3's player count during a similar post-launch period, marking a significant achievement for Capcom. The high engagement is attributed to the game's appeal among both single-player and co-op gaming enthusiasts. The game has already broken sales records for Capcom, indicating its potential to become one of the company's most successful titles.

The release of Monster Hunter Wilds was strategically timed with simultaneous multi-platform availability, enhancing its reach. Capcom has announced two major Title Updates to sustain player interest and extend gameplay longevity. These updates will introduce new monsters and difficulty levels, addressing player feedback for more challenging content. This ongoing development and the introduction of weekly events demonstrate Capcom's commitment to keeping the player community engaged. The game's impressive start positions it as a significant entry in the gaming industry, potentially reshaping expectations for multi-platform releases.

Capcom Monster Hunter Wilds Baldur’s Gate 3 Steam Player Count Video Game Releases Multi Platform Gaming

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

5.8

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides an overview of the success and player engagement of 'Monster Hunter Wilds', comparing it to 'Baldur's Gate 3'. It effectively captures interest by discussing current trends in the gaming industry and highlighting future updates. However, the lack of detailed data, source attribution, and alternative perspectives limits its accuracy and depth. While it is timely and relevant to gamers, its impact on a broader audience is constrained by its focus and lack of critical analysis. Overall, the article serves as a basic introduction to the topic but would benefit from more comprehensive reporting and verification.

Accuracy

The article makes several claims about the player count and success of 'Monster Hunter Wilds' compared to 'Baldur's Gate 3'. While it states that 'Monster Hunter Wilds' is maintaining around 650,000 players per night, the actual player count is closer to 324,804 on Steam, according to available data. This discrepancy indicates a lack of precision in the reporting. The article correctly notes that 'Monster Hunter Wilds' had a significant peak player count, but the comparison with 'Baldur's Gate 3' lacks specific historical data to substantiate the claim. Additionally, the mention of sales records and future updates could benefit from more detailed verification.

Balance

The article focuses primarily on the success of 'Monster Hunter Wilds', with comparisons to 'Baldur's Gate 3'. While it provides a positive outlook on 'Monster Hunter Wilds', it does not delve deeply into any potential criticisms or challenges the game might face. The lack of alternative perspectives or counterpoints regarding the game's success or player engagement may suggest a slight imbalance in the narrative.

Clarity

The article is generally clear in its language and structure. It presents information in a logical sequence, starting with a comparison to 'Baldur's Gate 3' and moving on to discuss player engagement and future updates. However, the lack of detailed data and specific sources may cause some confusion for readers seeking more in-depth analysis.

Source quality

The article does not cite specific sources for its claims about player counts or sales figures. This lack of attribution makes it difficult to assess the credibility and reliability of the information presented. The absence of direct quotes or references to authoritative sources in the gaming industry further diminishes the perceived quality of the sources.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in terms of how the data and claims were obtained. There is no explanation of the methodology used to gather player count statistics or sales data. Additionally, there is no disclosure of potential conflicts of interest, such as any affiliations with the game developers or publishers, which could impact the impartiality of the reporting.