Left-wing DA forcing prosecutors to consider 'racial identity' in plea deals

Fox News - Apr 27th, 2025

In a controversial move, the Hennepin County Attorney's Office in Minnesota has issued a new policy requiring prosecutors to consider defendants' racial identity and age when negotiating plea deals. This directive, part of the 'Negotiations Policy for Cases Involving Adult Defendants,' aims to address racial disparities within the justice system. However, the policy has sparked a constitutional debate, with some legal experts questioning its validity under the Equal Protection Clause, while others argue it is a necessary step to mitigate unconscious bias.

Mary Moriarty, the Hennepin County Attorney, has faced criticism for this policy, especially following recent decisions not to charge a Democrat-connected individual involved in Tesla vandalism. The policy, set to take effect on April 28, is seen as part of a broader trend toward progressive prosecutorial practices, backed by figures like George Soros. While the policy intends to promote equity and public safety, it has drawn concern from families of crime victims and legal experts who fear it conflicts with established sentencing guidelines and could lead to perceptions of a two-tiered justice system.

Hennepin County Plea Deals George Soros Constitutional Law Mary Moriarty Racial Identity Legal Debate

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.0

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides a timely and relevant examination of a new policy directive in Hennepin County that requires consideration of racial identity in plea deals. It effectively highlights the controversy surrounding the policy by presenting differing legal opinions and connecting it to broader political narratives. However, the article's accuracy and source quality are somewhat limited by the lack of direct quotes from primary sources and detailed evidence supporting some claims. While the piece is generally clear and engaging, it could benefit from more transparency about its information sources and a more focused narrative that prioritizes the core issue. Overall, the article contributes to important discussions about race and justice but requires further verification and evidence to strengthen its credibility.

Accuracy

The article presents several factual claims that are generally accurate but require further verification for full confidence. It accurately reports on the Hennepin County Attorney's policy directive to consider racial identity and age in plea deals, citing local news outlet KARE 11. However, the precise language of the policy and its effective date need verification through official documents. The article also mentions differing legal opinions on the constitutionality of the policy, which aligns with expert views but could benefit from more direct quotes or references to legal texts. Additionally, the story's claim about Mary Moriarty being 'Soros-backed' is a common narrative used by some media but requires evidence of specific financial links to Soros-funded groups.

Balance

The article attempts to present a balanced view by including opinions from multiple legal experts with differing perspectives on the policy's constitutionality. However, it leans towards a critical stance by highlighting concerns over the policy's potential legal issues and linking it to broader political narratives about 'soft-on-crime' prosecutors. The inclusion of Moriarty's office's rationale for the policy adds some balance, but the article could improve by providing more context on the motivations behind the policy and the perspectives of those who support it.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, with a logical flow of information. It presents the main points concisely and uses straightforward language. However, the inclusion of multiple subtopics, such as the Tesla vandalism case and the broader political context, may distract from the core issue of the plea deal policy. Simplifying the narrative and focusing more directly on the policy's implications could improve clarity.

Source quality

The primary source for the article's claims is a local news outlet, KARE 11, which lends some credibility. However, the article also relies on general narratives about George Soros and 'soft-on-crime' prosecutors without citing specific sources or financial links. The inclusion of expert opinions from university professors adds authority, but the lack of direct quotes from official documents or statements from the Hennepin County Attorney's Office weakens the source quality.

Transparency

The article provides some context for the policy change, such as the rationale of addressing racial disparities, but lacks detailed explanations of how the information was obtained or verified. There is no clear disclosure of potential conflicts of interest or the methodology used to gather expert opinions. Greater transparency regarding the sources of information and the basis for claims would enhance the article's credibility.