Tim Walz employee who allegedly caused over $20K in damages to Teslas let off by woke Minnesota DA — as cops slam deal

New York Post - Apr 22nd, 2025

A controversy has arisen in Minneapolis as Hennepin County District Attorney Mary Moriarty has decided not to charge Dylan Bryan Adams, a Minnesota government employee accused of vandalizing six Teslas, causing $20,000 in damage. Instead of pursuing criminal charges, Moriarty has chosen a diversion approach aimed at restitution and reducing the likelihood of repeat offenses. This decision has drawn criticism from Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O'Hara, who expressed frustration that the police department's efforts in investigating and presenting the case were ultimately declined by the DA's office. The police chief emphasized the impact on the victims and the significant amount of damage caused, underscoring the police department's disappointment.

The broader context of this decision reflects ongoing tensions regarding Mary Moriarty's prosecutorial policies since she took office in January 2023. Her approach has been criticized as 'woke,' particularly for allowing accused individuals, including those charged with serious offenses, to avoid traditional prosecution. This latest decision not to pursue charges in a high-profile vandalism case further highlights the debate over how property crimes are handled and raises questions about accountability and justice in cases involving significant financial damages. The implications of this approach could affect public trust in the legal system, especially among victims who may feel justice is not being adequately served.

Hennepin County Tesla Vandalism Mary Moriarty Dylan Bryan Adams Minneapolis Police Diversion Program Property Crime Prosecutorial Policies

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.6

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a largely accurate account of a controversial decision by the Hennepin County District Attorney, supported by credible sources such as police statements and CBS News reports. It effectively highlights the differing perspectives of law enforcement and the DA's office, although it leans towards criticism of the DA through its language and emphasis.

While the article is timely and addresses issues of public interest, it could benefit from broader source variety and greater transparency in its reporting process. The use of charged language, such as "woke policies," may introduce bias and affect the balance of perspectives presented.

Overall, the article is clear and readable, engaging readers on important topics related to criminal justice and government accountability. However, it could enhance its impact and engagement by including more diverse viewpoints and inviting expert commentary to deepen the analysis and discussion.

Accuracy

The article presents several factual claims that are largely supported by external sources. It accurately identifies Dylan Bryan Adams as a Minnesota government employee and details the alleged vandalism of Tesla vehicles, citing the extent of damages as over $20,000. The decision by Hennepin County District Attorney Mary Moriarty to seek diversion rather than criminal charges is also accurately reported, including the rationale provided by her office. However, the article's mention of Moriarty's "woke policies" and previous controversial decisions lacks specific examples or context, which could benefit from further verification.

Balance

The article provides viewpoints from both the police chief, who is critical of the DA's decision, and the DA's office, which explains its rationale for seeking diversion. However, the tone of the article appears to lean towards criticism of the DA, particularly through the use of charged language such as "woke policies." While the police perspective is well-represented, the article could benefit from additional perspectives, such as those of legal experts or community members, to provide a more balanced view.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and easy to follow, with a logical structure that outlines the key facts and reactions. The language is straightforward, though the use of terms like "woke policies" may introduce bias. The article effectively communicates the main points but could enhance clarity by providing more detailed context and avoiding loaded language that may skew the reader's interpretation.

Source quality

The article references statements from credible sources, including the Minneapolis Police Chief and the DA's office, which adds to its reliability. However, it does not provide direct quotes or detailed attributions from these sources, relying instead on paraphrasing. The inclusion of CBS News as a source lends credibility, but the article would benefit from a wider range of sources to enhance its authority and depth.

Transparency

The article provides some context regarding the DA's decision-making process, citing the rationale for diversion. However, it lacks transparency in terms of its own sourcing and methodology. The article does not disclose how it obtained the information or whether it independently verified the claims. Additionally, the article could clarify any potential biases or conflicts of interest that might affect its reporting.