Food workers roasted for confessing ‘s–tty’ ways they ripped off employers — including pocketing cash and entering ghost orders

New York Post - Mar 27th, 2025

A Reddit thread on r/confession has exposed a series of shocking admissions by former restaurant workers who admitted to various tactics of stealing from their employers. The confessions started with a Chili's employee disclosing that they would steal from customers ordering the 2-for-$20 deal, which prompted others to share their experiences. Notable mentions include a McDonald's worker who pocketed cash by deleting orders, a TGI Friday's employee exploiting coupon discounts, and similar stories from workers at Ruby Tuesday, Dunkin', Olive Garden, and Jamba Juice. The thread has garnered significant attention, with many condemning these unethical practices.

The revelations provide a glimpse into the dishonest activities some restaurant employees engage in, highlighting the vulnerabilities in the system that allow such behaviors. These stories underscore the importance of robust monitoring and auditing processes within the hospitality industry to prevent theft and ensure integrity in customer transactions. The ethical implications are significant, as these actions not only harm the business financially but also damage the reputation of honest workers in the sector. The conversation has sparked debate over employee conduct and the broader issues of trust and accountability in the service industry.

Theft Mc Donald's Ethics Dunkin' Reddit Restaurant Workers Chili's Tgi Friday's Ruby Tuesday Olive Garden Jamba Juice Employee Conduct

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

4.0

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article presents a series of sensational claims about unethical practices by restaurant employees, primarily sourced from a Reddit thread. While the narrative is engaging and touches on a relevant issue, the lack of verification and balanced perspectives undermines its credibility and impact. The reliance on anonymous, user-generated content without further investigation raises questions about the accuracy and reliability of the claims. The article's sensational tone and lack of context limit its potential to inform or influence public opinion meaningfully. A more comprehensive and evidence-based approach, including diverse perspectives and a deeper exploration of the underlying issues, could enhance its quality and relevance. Despite these shortcomings, the article successfully captures attention and provokes discussion, highlighting its engagement potential.

Accuracy

The story presents a series of claims about unethical practices by restaurant employees, purportedly shared on Reddit. While the narrative is plausible, it lacks concrete evidence or direct links to the original Reddit posts, making verification challenging. The article mentions specific incidents at well-known chains like Chili's, McDonald's, and Olive Garden, but without corroborating details, these remain anecdotal. The lack of direct quotes or references to the original Reddit thread diminishes the story's precision and verifiability. Without additional evidence or confirmation from the implicated restaurants or employees, the truthfulness of these claims is questionable.

Balance

The article predominantly focuses on the confessions of restaurant workers engaging in theft, presenting a one-sided narrative. It briefly mentions public outrage in the form of negative comments, but these are not given equal weight or depth. The story lacks perspectives from other stakeholders, such as restaurant management or customers, which could provide a more balanced view. By not exploring the reasons behind these unethical behaviors or potential systemic issues within the restaurant industry, the article misses an opportunity to present a more nuanced discussion.

Clarity

The article is written in a straightforward, engaging manner, making it easy to follow. The use of specific examples and anecdotes helps to illustrate the claims, although the lack of supporting evidence detracts from their impact. The narrative is logically structured, moving from one example to another, but the absence of a broader context or analysis leaves the reader with unanswered questions. The tone is somewhat sensationalist, which may affect the perceived neutrality of the piece.

Source quality

The primary source for the article appears to be a Reddit thread, which is inherently unreliable due to the anonymity of its users. There is no indication that the author attempted to verify the claims through additional sources, such as interviews with restaurant employees or management. The reliance on user-generated content without further investigation undermines the credibility of the reporting. Additionally, the lack of direct links to the Reddit posts or any other corroborating evidence raises questions about the authenticity and reliability of the claims.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in its sourcing and methodology. It does not provide any information about how the Reddit thread was discovered or whether any attempts were made to verify the claims. There is no disclosure of potential conflicts of interest or biases that might affect the reporting. Without clear attribution or explanation of the basis for the claims, readers are left to question the legitimacy of the information presented. This lack of transparency significantly impacts the article's credibility.