The article presents several factual claims regarding the incident, including the sequence of events and reactions from political leaders. However, it lacks concrete evidence and direct quotes from reliable sources that verify these claims. For example, the assertion that the plane was 'thought to have come under fire from Russian air defence systems' is not backed by evidence or expert testimony. The narrative of electronic jamming and GPS interference is also presented without sufficient technical analysis or corroboration from independent aviation experts. The article does correctly report on public statements made by President Aliyev and President Putin, but there is ambiguity in the reporting of technical details surrounding the crash. Overall, the article would benefit from more robust sourcing and verification of technical claims to enhance its factual accuracy.

The article predominantly highlights the Azerbaijani perspective, particularly President Aliyev's accusations against Russia. It heavily emphasizes Aliyev's claims of a Russian cover-up and demands for compensation, while offering limited insight into the Russian viewpoint beyond a brief mention of President Putin's apology. The article does not explore potential Russian justifications or provide commentary from Russian officials or independent analysts, which would have offered a more balanced perspective. Additionally, it references Ukraine's President Zelensky's comments without further exploring the geopolitical implications or providing context. This imbalance creates a narrative that seems skewed towards one side, potentially influencing reader perceptions without presenting a fair range of viewpoints. To improve balance, the article should incorporate more diverse perspectives, including expert analyses and Russian responses.

The article is generally clear and well-structured, presenting a chronological account of the events and reactions surrounding the plane crash. The language is straightforward, making complex geopolitical issues accessible to a broad audience. It maintains a professional tone, avoiding overly emotive language, although it sometimes lacks nuance in presenting differing perspectives. However, certain segments could benefit from additional clarity, particularly when discussing technical aspects of the incident, such as the effects of electronic jamming on the aircraft. The article could also improve by clearly differentiating between reported facts and speculative claims. Overall, while the article is readable and well-organized, it could enhance clarity by providing more detailed explanations and clearly distinguishing between verified information and interpretations.

The article does not provide explicit attributions to credible sources or authoritative experts. It relies heavily on statements from political figures and lacks input from independent aviation experts or international investigators who could provide additional credibility to the technical details discussed. The absence of named sources or detailed references undermines the article's reliability and leaves readers questioning the validity of the claims presented. Furthermore, the article does not cite any official reports or documents that could substantiate the allegations made by President Aliyev. To enhance source quality, the article should include references to official investigations, expert opinions, and named sources that can verify the facts and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the incident.

The article does not adequately disclose its sources or provide sufficient context for the claims made, which affects its transparency. While it reports on statements from various political leaders, it fails to clarify the basis for these statements or the methodologies used to arrive at certain conclusions, such as the impact of electronic jamming on the plane's navigation systems. Additionally, the article does not discuss any potential conflicts of interest or biases that might influence the reporting, such as the political relationships between Azerbaijan, Russia, and Ukraine. The lack of transparency in sourcing and context leaves readers with unanswered questions about the credibility of the information presented. To improve transparency, the article should provide clear attributions, detailed context for claims, and disclose any relevant affiliations or biases.