The article presents President Aliyev's claims that the Azerbaijani airliner was shot down by Russia, albeit unintentionally, and criticizes Russia for attempting to 'hush up' the incident. While the article accurately quotes Aliyev and provides context about the geopolitical tensions, it lacks substantial evidence to verify the incident's details. The claims are primarily based on statements from Azerbaijani and Russian officials without independent corroboration. The article would benefit from citing additional sources, such as international aviation experts or independent investigators, to substantiate the claims. Furthermore, the mention of previous incidents, like Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, provides some context but does not directly support the current situation's accuracy. More precise data or evidence from the ongoing investigation would enhance the article's factual accuracy.

The article predominantly presents the perspective of Azerbaijan's President, Ilham Aliyev, and briefly mentions Russia's response. While it quotes Aliyev extensively, it offers limited insight into the Russian viewpoint beyond a brief statement from Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov and a general description of Putin's response. The article could be more balanced by including perspectives from independent analysts, aviation experts, or international bodies involved in the investigation. Additionally, exploring more of Russia's narrative or response to Azerbaijan's demands could provide a more comprehensive understanding. The article's balance is further affected by the emotive language used to describe Russia's initial 'delirious versions' of events, which suggests some bias. Enhancing the representation of diverse viewpoints would improve the article's balance.

The article is generally well-written, with a logical structure that clearly outlines the sequence of events and the key claims made by President Aliyev. The language is straightforward, making it accessible to readers. However, certain sections could be clarified further, such as the technical details about the electronic warfare and how it rendered the plane uncontrollable. The article maintains a mostly neutral tone but occasionally uses emotive language, such as describing Russia's initial explanations as 'delirious.' While this adds color to the narrative, it could detract from the article's objectivity. Overall, the article is clear and coherent, but refining some technical explanations and maintaining a consistently neutral tone would enhance its clarity.

The article primarily relies on statements from President Aliyev and Russian officials, with little reference to independent or authoritative sources. The reliance on government statements without additional verification from third-party sources raises concerns about the article's credibility. The Associated Press writer Aida Sultanova's contribution is mentioned, but her specific input or sources are not detailed. The article would benefit from incorporating information from aviation experts, international investigators, or other reputable news agencies to strengthen the credibility of its claims. Additionally, verifying the facts with independent sources would help ensure the information's reliability and reduce potential bias arising from political interests.

The article provides a clear account of President Aliyev's statements and demands but lacks detailed disclosure of the sources and methodologies used to verify the claims. There is no mention of potential conflicts of interest, and the article does not explain the basis for its assertions beyond quoting Azerbaijani and Russian officials. Greater transparency could be achieved by detailing how the information was obtained and whether any potential biases or affiliations might influence the reporting. Additionally, explaining the role of Associated Press writer Aida Sultanova and her contributions would enhance transparency. The article could also benefit from discussing the ongoing investigation's methodologies and the potential impact of political dynamics on the information provided.