An Update On ‘The Wheel Of Time’ Season 4 On Amazon Prime Video

Forbes - Apr 19th, 2025

The Wheel of Time has achieved a major milestone by reaching the top of Netflix's most-watched shows list with its latest season finale. This development has sparked speculation about a potential season 4, especially given the show's critical acclaim, with a 97% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, significantly surpassing the ratings of its earlier seasons. Showrunner Rafe Judkins and lead actor Josha Stradowski have hinted at Amazon's interest in continuing the series, despite the challenge of adapting a 14-book series into a finite number of seasons. The show's success contrasts sharply with the declining viewership of The Rings of Power, which has reportedly seen its audience halve in its second season.

The context of this story highlights the dynamic landscape of fantasy television series, where production costs and audience retention play critical roles in determining the fate of shows. The Wheel of Time's ascent is noteworthy not only for its artistic and technical achievements but also for its potential to influence Amazon's strategic decisions regarding its streaming content. The show's growing popularity and the comparative underperformance of The Rings of Power might prompt Amazon to shift its focus and resources towards its more successful and cost-effective series. This development underscores the competitive nature of the streaming industry and the importance of audience engagement and satisfaction in determining the longevity of television projects.

Netflix Amazon The Wheel Of Time Streaming Services Rafe Judkins Fantasy Tv Series Josha Stradowski The Rings Of Power

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

5.4

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article presents an engaging and timely topic by discussing the potential for a fourth season of **The Wheel of Time**. It effectively captures reader interest through comparisons with **The Rings of Power** and speculation about Amazon's strategic decisions. However, the article suffers from significant factual inaccuracies, such as the incorrect claim about topping Netflix's list, and lacks sufficient sourcing and transparency. The speculative nature of many claims, combined with the absence of official data or statements, undermines the story's credibility. While the article is clear and accessible, its overall reliability is compromised by these issues, making it necessary for readers to seek additional information to fully understand the context and accuracy of the claims presented.

Accuracy

The factual accuracy of the story is mixed. It incorrectly states that **The Wheel of Time** topped Netflix's most-watched shows list, which is not possible as the show is an Amazon Prime Video exclusive. This is a significant error in the story. Additionally, the claim that **The Wheel of Time** is better received than **The Rings of Power** is subjective and lacks concrete data to support it. The mention of a 97% rating on Rotten Tomatoes for the current season is precise, but it requires verification to ensure accuracy. The story's speculation about Amazon's strategic decisions and potential viewership trends lacks solid evidence or direct quotes from Amazon, making these claims less reliable.

Balance

The story provides a biased perspective by favoring **The Wheel of Time** over **The Rings of Power**. It suggests that **The Wheel of Time** is superior, but does not offer viewpoints or data from both sides to substantiate this claim. The article lacks a balanced presentation of both series' strengths and weaknesses, focusing mainly on the potential success of **The Wheel of Time** without acknowledging the merits or challenges faced by **The Rings of Power**.

Clarity

The article is written in a clear and engaging manner, with a logical flow that guides the reader through the main points. The language is accessible, making it easy for a general audience to understand. However, the lack of clarity in sourcing and the presence of speculative statements without sufficient context can lead to confusion about the article's reliability.

Source quality

The article references a statement from actor Josha Stradowski and mentions showrunner Rafe Judkins' comments, but lacks citations or direct quotes from these individuals. The absence of links to interviews or reliable sources weakens the credibility of the information presented. Additionally, the story does not provide any official statements from Amazon, which would be crucial for verifying claims about future seasons and strategic decisions.

Transparency

The article does not clearly disclose the basis for its claims or the methodology used to arrive at its conclusions. It lacks transparency in revealing the sources of its information, particularly regarding the comparison between **The Wheel of Time** and **The Rings of Power**. The absence of explicit references to interviews or data sources makes it difficult for readers to assess the validity of the claims made.