A Dramatic New Apple Watch AI Feature Is Incoming

Forbes - Mar 24th, 2025

Apple is reportedly working on incorporating a camera into its Apple Watch Series 10, aiming for a revolutionary feature update. The camera's purpose is not for photography but to enable the wearable to analyze and interact with the environment using Apple's visual intelligence technology, initially introduced with the iPhone 16. This feature allows for real-time translation, object recognition, and information retrieval, significantly enhancing the utility of the device. The Apple Watch Ultra is expected to have the camera positioned by the crown, while the standard model may integrate it within the screen, potentially using under-screen camera technology still under development.

This development carries significant implications, hinting at Apple's broader ambitions in wearable tech and augmented reality. Visual intelligence in the Apple Watch could be a precursor to Apple's long-rumored smart glasses, aligning with industry trends as seen with Meta's advancements in smart eyewear. Although the Apple Watch with a camera is not expected until 2027, this innovation could redefine user interaction with wearable technology and set the stage for future augmented reality products, potentially positioning Apple as a key player in the evolving tech landscape.

Meta Apple Apple Watch Mark Gurman Wearable Technology Visual Intelligence Smart Glasses

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides an informative overview of potential future developments in the Apple Watch series, focusing on the integration of a camera and AI features. It is based on credible sources, primarily Mark Gurman from Bloomberg, but lacks direct confirmation from Apple. The story is clear and engaging, with a logical structure that makes it accessible to readers interested in technology. However, it could benefit from a more balanced perspective, exploring potential challenges and implications of the proposed features. Transparency is limited, as the article does not disclose the methodology or potential conflicts of interest behind the information. While the topic is timely and of public interest, the speculative nature of the content means its immediate impact and engagement are somewhat limited. Overall, the article is a well-written piece that could be strengthened by additional sources and a broader exploration of the topic's implications.

Accuracy

The story presents several factual claims that align with existing reports and rumors about future Apple Watch developments. It accurately cites Mark Gurman from Bloomberg, a reputable source for Apple-related news, as the origin of the claims about the potential inclusion of a camera in future Apple Watch models. However, the story lacks direct confirmation from Apple, which is a significant gap. The timeline for the release of these features, projected for 2027, aligns with current speculation but remains speculative until officially confirmed. The description of 'visual intelligence' features parallels existing technologies in iPhones, lending some credibility, yet the specifics for the Apple Watch remain unverified.

Balance

The article primarily presents a single perspective—that of potential new features in the Apple Watch—without exploring alternative views or potential criticisms. For example, it does not consider the potential drawbacks or challenges of integrating a camera into a wearable device, such as privacy concerns or technical limitations. The story could be more balanced by including expert opinions or consumer perspectives on these developments. As it stands, the article seems to favorably present the potential innovations without critical analysis.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and concise, with a logical flow of information. It effectively explains complex technological concepts like 'visual intelligence' in a way that is accessible to a general audience. The structure is coherent, with each paragraph building on the previous one to provide a comprehensive overview of the potential new features. However, some technical jargon is used without sufficient explanation, which could confuse readers unfamiliar with the technology.

Source quality

The primary source of information, Mark Gurman from Bloomberg, is a well-regarded journalist known for accurate reporting on Apple. This lends a high degree of credibility to the claims presented. However, the article does not cite any additional sources or provide corroborating evidence from other industry experts or Apple itself. The reliance on a single source, albeit a reliable one, limits the breadth of the source quality.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in terms of the methodology behind the claims. It does not disclose how the information was obtained or whether there were any conflicts of interest. While it mentions Mark Gurman as the source, it doesn't explain the basis for his claims or the extent of his access to insider information. Greater transparency about the sources and methods used to gather information would enhance the article's credibility.