You Should Watch Destiny 2’s Amazing New Cutscene, Even If You’ve Left

Forbes - Mar 16th, 2025

Bungie has released a standout cutscene in Destiny 2 during Act 2 of Episode 3, Heresy, showcasing high production quality and engaging storytelling. The scene delves into the complex lore of the Hive God pantheon, highlighting the quasi-return of a dead Oryx, Savathun's struggle with Hive history, and Xivu Arath's quest for power. Eris, killed by the Dread but resurrected in her Throne World, emerges more powerful than ever. Bungie's episodic format has allowed for more such cinematic experiences, though recent industry challenges cast doubt on future productions.

The release of this cutscene comes at a time when Bungie faces significant transitions, including layoffs and the closure of its cinematic partner, Axios Studios. These developments raise questions about the sustainability of producing high-quality content in the future. Despite these hurdles, the cutscene marks a high point in Destiny 2's storytelling, suggesting that the game may still deliver compelling narratives as it transitions into the new Frontiers era. Fans are left anticipating whether Bungie can maintain this level of storytelling amidst its current challenges.

Gaming Industry Destiny 2 Bungie Hive God Pantheon Oryx Savathun Xivu Arath Eris Axios Studios Cutscenes Episodic Format

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.0

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides an engaging and timely overview of a new cutscene in Destiny 2, highlighting its production quality and significance within the game's lore. It effectively captures the interest of its target audience, the gaming community, and offers insights into recent industry changes that may affect future content. However, the article would benefit from greater factual support and transparency, particularly regarding speculative claims about Bungie's future and the impact of layoffs and studio closures. Including more balanced perspectives and authoritative sources would enhance its credibility and depth. Overall, the article succeeds in engaging its intended audience but could improve in areas of source quality, transparency, and balance to provide a more comprehensive and reliable analysis.

Accuracy

The story accurately describes the release of a new cutscene in Destiny 2 and its significance in terms of production quality. It correctly identifies the lore elements involving characters like Oryx, Savathun, and Eris. However, the article's claims about the impact of Bungie's layoffs and the shutdown of Axios Studios on future content are speculative and require further verification. The narrative about Eris's status in the game is consistent with the known storyline, though the article could benefit from direct citations or references to official Bungie announcements or game updates for stronger factual support.

Balance

The article primarily presents a positive view of the new Destiny 2 cutscene, focusing on its production quality and storytelling impact. While it acknowledges potential challenges due to Bungie's internal changes, it lacks a thorough exploration of any negative aspects or criticisms of the game's current state. The article could be more balanced by including perspectives from players or critics who might have differing opinions on the game's direction or the quality of recent content.

Clarity

The article is well-written and easy to follow, with a clear focus on the new cutscene in Destiny 2. The language is accessible, and the narrative flows logically from the introduction of the cutscene to its potential implications. However, the article could benefit from clearer differentiation between confirmed facts and speculation, particularly in the discussion of future content and industry changes.

Source quality

The article lacks direct citations from authoritative sources such as Bungie or industry experts, relying instead on the author's observations and interpretations. The absence of links to official statements or detailed sources limits the reliability of the claims made, particularly regarding the impact of layoffs and studio closures. Including quotes or data from reputable sources would enhance the credibility of the information presented.

Transparency

The article does not provide much transparency regarding the basis of its claims, particularly those about future content and the impact of industry changes. There is no clear methodology or explanation of how the author arrived at their conclusions, especially regarding the quality of the cutscene and the speculative aspects of Bungie's future. Greater transparency about the sources of information and the author's background would improve reader trust.