The article provides a reasonably accurate portrayal of Yoko Ono's experiences and the content of the documentary "One to One: John & Yoko." It correctly identifies Ono's role as a musician, artist, and activist, and her association with John Lennon. The claims about Ono facing vitriol after The Beatles' breakup and being used as a scapegoat are consistent with historical accounts. However, the article could benefit from more precise sourcing or corroboration for specific personal anecdotes, such as the harassment Ono faced and her miscarriages. These personal stories, while compelling, are harder to verify without direct quotes from the documentary or other primary sources.

The article primarily focuses on Ono's perspective, highlighting her struggles and experiences. While this is central to the documentary's theme, the article could have provided a more balanced view by including perspectives from other individuals involved in The Beatles' breakup or reactions from contemporary critics. This would help to contextualize Ono's experiences within a broader narrative, potentially addressing any counter-narratives or differing opinions about her role in the band's dissolution.

The article is well-written and clearly conveys the main points about the documentary and Ono's experiences. It effectively uses direct quotes to illustrate Ono's perspective, and the narrative flows logically from one point to the next. The language is accessible, making it easy for readers to understand the complexities of the issues discussed. However, the article could benefit from more detailed explanations of certain historical contexts to enhance reader comprehension.

The article lacks explicit attribution to sources beyond the documentary itself. While it references Ono's statements and experiences, it does not provide direct quotes from the documentary or interviews, reducing the reliability of the claims. The quality of the sources could be improved by citing interviews, archival footage, or expert commentary to bolster the narrative and provide a fuller picture of the events described.

The article could improve its transparency by providing more context about the documentary's creation, such as the filmmakers' intentions and any potential biases. It mentions Sean Lennon's role as an executive producer, but more information about the documentary's methodology or the selection of its content would enhance transparency. Additionally, clarifying how Ono's quotes were obtained would help readers assess the reliability of the information presented.