The story presents several factual claims about Mariah May's career and contract status with AEW. It accurately mentions her debut, achievements, and current standing in AEW, such as winning the AEW Women's World Championship and participating in the Owen Hart Foundation Women's Tournament. However, the article lacks precise verification for some claims, such as the exact expiration date of her contract and whether WWE is actively pursuing her. The mention of option years in her contract is speculative, with sources expressing surprise if they do not exist, which indicates a lack of concrete evidence.

The article primarily focuses on Mariah May's potential contract situation and career highlights, primarily from AEW's perspective. It briefly mentions WWE's potential interest but does not provide a balanced view by including perspectives from WWE or Mariah May herself, which could offer a more rounded understanding of the situation. The narrative seems to favor AEW's perspective, possibly due to the sources cited, which might result in a skewed representation of the situation.

The article is generally clear in its language and structure, presenting information in a logical sequence. It effectively outlines Mariah May's career path and current standing in AEW. However, the article could enhance clarity by providing more explicit connections between claims and sources, particularly where speculative elements are involved. The use of technical wrestling terms is appropriate for the target audience but might confuse readers unfamiliar with the wrestling industry.

The primary source of information in the article is Fightful Select, which is known for wrestling news but may not provide the most authoritative or unbiased perspective. The article lacks a variety of sources, relying heavily on unnamed sources within AEW, which could impact the reliability of the information. The absence of direct quotes or statements from Mariah May, AEW executives, or WWE representatives further weakens the source quality.

The article does not clearly disclose the methodology behind the information gathering, such as how sources were selected or the context in which information was obtained. There is also a lack of transparency regarding potential conflicts of interest, as the narrative seems to favor AEW. The article could benefit from more explicit disclosures about the basis of its claims, particularly concerning contract details and WWE's interest.