Why does the US restrict its presidents to 2 terms?

Apnews - Apr 1st, 2025

President Donald Trump has suggested a potential bid for a third presidential term in 2028, which would defy the long-standing precedent and legal framework established by the U.S. Constitution's 22nd Amendment. This amendment, ratified after Franklin Delano Roosevelt's four-term presidency, restricts any president from serving more than two terms. Trump’s comments challenge this historical norm that began with George Washington’s voluntary two-term limit and was later codified to prevent any single individual from holding prolonged power. His statements have sparked discussions about the potential legal and constitutional hurdles such a move would face.

The idea of a third term for Trump raises significant questions about the durability of constitutional amendments and the balance of power in American politics. Historically, the two-term limit has been a safeguard against authoritarian rule, a principle rooted in the country's democratic values. Trump's suggestion underscores a broader debate about presidential power and its limitations, evoking comparisons with past leaders like Theodore Roosevelt and FDR, who faced similar criticisms. The implications of such a candidacy could reshape the political landscape and provoke a re-evaluation of the established checks and balances that have governed the U.S. presidency for centuries.

Donald Trump U.S. Presidency Constitutional Law 22nd Amendment Third Term Presidential History

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.6

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a comprehensive overview of the historical and legal context of U.S. presidential term limits. It accurately presents key facts about the precedent set by George Washington and the subsequent establishment of the 22nd Amendment following Franklin D. Roosevelt's presidency. The inclusion of Donald Trump's comments adds a contemporary angle, making the topic relevant to current political debates. However, the article could benefit from more explicit sourcing and expert commentary to enhance credibility and transparency. Overall, the piece is well-structured, clear, and informative, effectively engaging readers interested in U.S. history and politics.

Accuracy

The story accurately presents historical facts about the two-term precedent set by George Washington and the subsequent establishment of the 22nd Amendment following Franklin D. Roosevelt's four terms. The details about Ulysses S. Grant and Theodore Roosevelt's unsuccessful attempts for a third term are also correct. The article accurately mentions Donald Trump's suggestions about a third term, aligning with his public statements. However, the story could benefit from more precise citations or references to specific sources, such as historical documents or expert commentary, to enhance verifiability.

Balance

The article provides a balanced overview of the historical context and legal framework surrounding U.S. presidential term limits. It includes perspectives on both the tradition of two-term limits and the exceptions, such as FDR's third and fourth terms. While the piece covers Trump's statements about a potential third term, it could include more viewpoints from constitutional scholars or political analysts to offer a fuller picture of the debate. Overall, the article maintains a neutral tone without showing favoritism towards any political figure.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and uses clear language to convey the historical and legal context of U.S. presidential terms. The chronological presentation of events helps maintain a logical flow, making it easy for readers to follow the narrative. The tone is neutral and informative, contributing to the overall clarity. However, the inclusion of more direct quotes or data points could enhance the comprehensibility of complex legal and historical details.

Source quality

The article appears to be based on historical records and well-documented events, such as Washington's precedent and the ratification of the 22nd Amendment. However, it lacks explicit citations or references to primary sources or expert opinions, which would strengthen its credibility. Including interviews with historians or political scientists would enhance the authority of the information provided. The absence of direct attributions to specific sources limits the assessment of the reliability and depth of the research behind the article.

Transparency

The article provides a clear narrative of the historical events and legal changes regarding presidential term limits but lacks transparency in sourcing. There are no explicit attributions or explanations of how the information was gathered, which could help readers understand the basis of the claims. The article would benefit from more detailed disclosures about the sources of its information or the methodology used in compiling the historical overview.