White House says it has a deal with China while Chinese call it 'consensus'

ABC News - May 11th, 2025

In recent trade discussions between the U.S. and China, significant progress was reported by both parties, with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng stating that important consensus had been reached. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer referred to the outcome as a 'deal,' while Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent noted 'substantial progress.' The White House confirmed an agreement was reached, though details remained sparse. The talks, aimed at easing the ongoing trade tensions, were marked by President Trump’s indication of a willingness to lower tariffs on Chinese goods, proposing a reduction from 145% to 80%. Both countries agreed to establish a consultation mechanism to address future trade and economic issues.

The backdrop of these negotiations is a trade war initiated by recent tariff increases, which saw China retaliate with tariffs on U.S. goods, affecting a significant portion of trade between the two countries. The tariff escalation has raised concerns about potential price hikes in the U.S., impacting consumers and businesses alike. Chinese officials emphasized their preference for resolving differences through dialogue and mutual respect, highlighting that any agreement would aim to be mutually beneficial. A joint statement on the agreement is anticipated to provide further details on the progress and next steps, reflecting a cautious optimism about the potential resolution of trade disputes.

Donald Trump Tariffs Scott Bessent Trade War He Lifeng Jamieson Greer Us China Trade Talks Economic Negotiations

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.6

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a timely and relevant overview of U.S.-China trade negotiations, drawing from credible sources and offering insights into the perspectives of key officials. It effectively captures the significance of the topic, given its potential impact on the global economy and public interest. However, the article's accuracy and engagement could be improved by including more specific details about the 'deal' and providing a balanced representation of both U.S. and Chinese perspectives. Greater transparency about the negotiation process and context would enhance the article's credibility and reader comprehension. Overall, the story is informative but leaves some critical questions unanswered, which may limit its impact and engagement potential.

Accuracy

The story presents several factual claims, such as statements from Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng and U.S. officials regarding the progress of trade talks. It accurately reports on the White House's announcement of a deal without specifics and aligns with the statements made by U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. However, the article lacks detailed verification of the 'deal' specifics and the exact terms agreed upon, which are crucial for full accuracy. The claim about President Trump's willingness to reduce tariffs from 145% to 80% is also presented without corroborating evidence or context on how this decision ties into the negotiations.

Balance

The article attempts to present both U.S. and Chinese perspectives, quoting officials from both sides, which provides a semblance of balance. However, it leans slightly towards the U.S. narrative by highlighting statements from multiple U.S. officials and President Trump, while the Chinese perspective is less detailed. The story could be more balanced by including more direct quotes or insights from Chinese negotiators to fully represent their stance.

Clarity

The article is generally clear in its presentation of information, with a logical flow from the announcement of the deal to the reactions of various officials. However, some sections could be more concise, particularly in explaining the implications of tariff changes and the potential impact on the trade war. The language is straightforward, but the lack of detailed context may leave readers with unanswered questions about the significance of the developments.

Source quality

The sources cited in the article are high-ranking officials from both the U.S. and Chinese governments, which lends credibility to the information presented. The inclusion of statements from Vice Premier He Lifeng, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicates reliance on authoritative sources. However, the article could benefit from additional independent analysis or commentary to provide a broader perspective.

Transparency

The article provides limited transparency regarding the methodology behind the reported claims, such as how the information was obtained or verified. While it cites statements from officials, it does not clarify the context of these statements or any potential biases. More transparency about the negotiation process and the implications of the 'deal' would enhance the article's credibility.