What SMBs Can Learn From Enterprise Threat Detection And Response Programs

Forbes - Apr 25th, 2025

Grayson Milbourne, a security intelligence director at OpenText Cybersecurity, highlights the increasing cyber threats faced by small- and medium-sized businesses (SMBs), which are experiencing more ransomware attacks than larger enterprises. This growing vulnerability emphasizes the urgent need for SMBs to adopt cost-effective cybersecurity strategies to safeguard their operations. By implementing key elements of enterprise threat detection and response programs, such as proactive threat hunting, real-time threat detection, and response automation, SMBs can enhance their security posture without overextending limited resources.

The significance of this development lies in the potential financial and reputational damage that cyber threats can inflict on SMBs, which often lack the resources to maintain a dedicated security operations center. By focusing on strategic outsourcing and good cyber hygiene, including regular security awareness training and access control management, SMBs can effectively mitigate risks. These actions are crucial in an era where AI-driven cyberattacks make rapid response as vital as detection. By prioritizing these strategies, SMBs can better defend against the modern threat landscape and ensure business continuity.

Cybersecurity Ransomware Grayson Milbourne Open Text Cybersecurity Sm Bs Threat Detection Response Automation Mssp Cyber Hygiene

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

5.0

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article addresses a timely and important topic by highlighting the cybersecurity challenges faced by small- and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and proposing potential solutions. It effectively communicates the urgency of the issue and offers practical strategies for risk mitigation. However, the piece lacks balance and transparency, as it does not provide sufficient data or diverse perspectives to support its claims. The reliance on a single source and the absence of direct citations or references weaken the overall credibility and reliability of the information presented. While the article is clear and accessible, its potential impact and engagement are limited by the lack of interactive elements and compelling narratives. Overall, the piece serves as a useful introduction to the topic but would benefit from more detailed data and a broader range of perspectives to enhance its quality and reliability.

Accuracy

The story presents several factual claims that align with broader industry trends but lack specific data points for verification. For instance, it mentions that SMBs experience more ransomware attacks than large enterprises, a claim that needs support from specific survey data. The article also states that a ransomware attack can be financially devastating for SMBs, which is generally supported by industry reports but lacks precise financial thresholds. The recommendation for SMBs to adopt enterprise threat detection strategies is logical but requires evidence of successful implementation in SMB contexts. Overall, while the article's claims are plausible, they need more detailed data and references to enhance verifiability.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on the challenges and strategies for SMBs in cybersecurity, offering a perspective that highlights their vulnerabilities and potential solutions. However, it lacks a balanced view by not discussing the limitations or potential downsides of the recommended strategies, such as the feasibility of implementing enterprise-level programs within SMB constraints. Additionally, the article does not present counterarguments or alternative viewpoints from cybersecurity experts who might offer different approaches or critique the suggested solutions. This focus on a single perspective limits the overall balance of the piece.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, with a logical flow that guides the reader through the challenges faced by SMBs and the proposed solutions. The language is straightforward and free of jargon, making the content accessible to a broad audience. However, the piece could benefit from more explicit definitions of technical terms and concepts, such as 'proactive threat hunting' and 'response automation,' to enhance comprehension for readers unfamiliar with cybersecurity terminology.

Source quality

The article cites Grayson Milbourne from OpenText Cybersecurity, which lends some authority to the piece. However, it lacks a variety of sources and does not provide direct citations or references to studies or data that support the claims made. The reliance on a single source without corroborating evidence from other cybersecurity experts or industry reports weakens the overall source quality. Additionally, the absence of direct quotes or detailed attribution reduces the credibility and reliability of the information presented.

Transparency

The article does not provide sufficient transparency regarding the basis of its claims. It references a survey without specifying the source, methodology, or scope, leaving readers without a clear understanding of the data's origin. The piece also lacks disclosure of any potential conflicts of interest, such as the author's affiliation with cybersecurity companies or financial incentives. This lack of transparency makes it difficult for readers to assess the impartiality and credibility of the information presented.