'We are still at war': Syria's Kurds battle Turkey months after Assad's fall

BBC - Feb 26th, 2025

In north-east Syria, the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) face renewed threats as Turkey and its allied rebel groups launch military operations near Kobane. Despite having fought off ISIS, the region is now under the strain of Turkish airstrikes and ongoing battles. Kurdish women, integral to the defense against ISIS, continue to play crucial roles amidst looming threats, as the region marks the 10-year anniversary of the Kobane siege. The Kurds, while celebrating their past victories, prepare for potential sieges, with tensions rising due to Turkey's attempts to push SDF back from its border.

The broader geopolitical landscape remains volatile as Syria's new interim president, Ahmad al-Sharaa, attempts to form an inclusive government amidst pressure from Turkey. Negotiations with Kurdish factions are stalled, and the US, along with France and some Arab nations, advocates for Kurdish rights recognition. However, the Kurds fear a potential withdrawal of US troops, which could leave them vulnerable to Turkish military actions and an ISIS resurgence. The situation is further complicated by the absence of Kurdish representation in Syria's national dialogue, raising concerns about their future role in the country's governance.

Bashar Al Assad Isis Ahmad Al Sharaa Kurdish Led Sdf Turkey Syria Conflict Kobane Siege Anniversary Ypj Us Military Presence Turkish Airstrikes Kurdish Rights

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a comprehensive overview of the complex situation in northeast Syria, focusing on the Kurdish struggle for autonomy and the ongoing conflicts with Turkey and other regional actors. Its strengths lie in its clarity, engagement, and timeliness, effectively conveying the human impact of the geopolitical tensions. However, the story would benefit from greater transparency and source attribution to enhance its credibility. While it presents a balanced view of the Kurdish perspective, additional voices from other stakeholders could provide a more rounded picture. Overall, the article succeeds in raising awareness about critical international issues, though it could further strengthen its impact by incorporating more diverse perspectives and detailed source references.

Accuracy

The story largely aligns with verified historical and current events regarding the Kurdish region in Syria and its conflicts. It accurately describes the Kurdish control of Rojava since 2012 and the Kurdish-led forces' role in fighting IS, corroborated by multiple sources. The ongoing Turkish military operations against the SDF and the geopolitical tensions with Turkey are well-documented, lending credibility to these claims. However, some details, such as specific military strategies or internal political negotiations, might require further verification from official statements or independent reports to ensure complete accuracy.

Balance

The story provides a comprehensive view of the Kurdish situation, highlighting the challenges faced by the Kurds from both IS and Turkish forces. It includes perspectives from Kurdish commanders, local civilians, and mentions the Turkish government's stance. However, it could benefit from a more balanced representation by including more direct quotes or perspectives from Turkish officials or the Syrian government to provide a fuller picture of the geopolitical dynamics.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and clearly written, making it easy for readers to follow the complex geopolitical situation in Syria. The use of personal stories and quotes helps to humanize the narrative and engage readers. However, the inclusion of more background information on certain groups and conflicts could enhance understanding for readers unfamiliar with the region's history.

Source quality

The article references significant historical events and quotes individuals on the ground, such as Kurdish commanders and civilians, which adds to its credibility. However, it lacks explicit attribution to specific sources or organizations for some claims, such as the exact details of military operations and political negotiations. Including more direct references to official reports or statements would enhance the reliability of the information presented.

Transparency

While the article provides a detailed narrative of events, it lacks transparency in terms of the sources of its information. There is no clear indication of how the information was gathered or which specific sources were consulted. Greater transparency regarding the methodology and the sources used would improve the article's credibility and allow readers to better assess the reliability of the information.