Watch the full, unedited video of Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs violently abusing Cassie Ventura in hotel

New York Post - May 14th, 2025

A full, unedited video showing Sean “Diddy” Combs abusing his then-girlfriend, Casandra “Cassie” Ventura, in 2016 has surfaced, adding a new layer of complexity to the ongoing legal proceedings against the music mogul. The video, recorded in a now-closed hotel, shows Combs in a robe interacting aggressively with Ventura. This footage was presented as evidence in Combs' sex-trafficking trial, where Ventura testified about his alleged abusive behaviors and coercive practices, including forcing a male escort to urinate on her and hosting drug-fueled parties.

The release of this video is significant as it underscores the allegations Ventura has made against Combs, further influencing public perception and the trial's potential outcome. The trial is set against a backdrop of previous accusations, including a settled lawsuit in November 2023 where Ventura accused Combs of rape and repeated abuse. As Combs faces charges such as racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking, this evidence and testimony could prove pivotal in the proceedings. The case highlights broader issues of domestic violence and power dynamics in relationships, drawing attention to the need for greater support and awareness.

Court Case Domestic Violence Sean Combs Diddy Racketeering Sex Trafficking Cassie Ventura Hotel Surveillance Video

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.2

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides a detailed account of serious allegations against Sean “Diddy” Combs, focusing on a current legal case with significant public interest. It is well-written and timely, capturing the attention of readers interested in celebrity news and social justice issues. However, the story would benefit from greater balance and transparency, as it predominantly presents Ventura's perspective without sufficient representation of Combs' defense or additional sources. While the article effectively engages readers and highlights important societal concerns, its impact could be enhanced by incorporating diverse viewpoints and more explicit source attributions. Overall, the story is a compelling piece that addresses critical issues but requires a more balanced and transparent approach to maximize its credibility and influence.

Accuracy

The story presents several factual claims, particularly regarding the release and content of a surveillance video depicting Sean “Diddy” Combs allegedly abusing Cassie Ventura. The story accurately describes the video's context and its role in legal proceedings, aligning with multiple sources that confirm the video's existence and its presentation in court. However, the article could enhance accuracy by providing more detailed citations or references to primary sources or court documents. The narrative about Ventura's allegations and the legal charges against Combs appears consistent with available information, but the absence of direct quotes or statements from involved parties slightly diminishes verifiability.

Balance

The story primarily focuses on allegations against Sean “Diddy” Combs, presenting Ventura's perspective and testimony in detail. While it provides context regarding the legal proceedings, it lacks a balanced representation of Combs' defense or perspective. This one-sided presentation may lead to perceived bias, as the article does not include statements from Combs or his legal team. Including multiple viewpoints, such as Combs' response to the allegations, would improve the story's balance.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, providing a detailed account of the events and legal context. It uses straightforward language and a logical flow to describe the video footage and Ventura's allegations. However, the inclusion of more direct quotes or explicit references to legal documents could enhance clarity by providing concrete evidence for the claims made. Overall, the story is easy to follow and understand.

Source quality

The article references the court proceedings and mentions Ventura's testimony, which suggests reliance on credible legal sources. However, the lack of explicit attribution to specific documents or direct quotes from court officials or attorneys weakens the source quality. The story could benefit from a more diverse range of sources, such as legal experts or direct statements from those involved, to enhance credibility and provide a more comprehensive view of the situation.

Transparency

The article provides a narrative of the events and legal proceedings but lacks transparency regarding its sources and the basis for its claims. It does not disclose the methodology for obtaining information about the surveillance video or the court proceedings, nor does it reveal any potential conflicts of interest. Clear attribution and explanation of the information-gathering process would improve transparency and help readers understand the story's foundation.