The article accurately describes the mechanics of change-of-address scams, including the impersonation of individuals to redirect their mail and the subsequent risks of identity theft and financial fraud. It explains how scammers use people search sites to obtain personal information and why they prefer mailing in change-of-address requests due to the lack of verification of signatures. However, the article could benefit from more specific data or statistics on the prevalence of such scams to strengthen its factual basis. The explanation of the process and consequences is clear and aligns with known practices, but verification of the effectiveness of USPS security measures would enhance accuracy.

The article predominantly focuses on the risks and prevention of change-of-address scams from the perspective of the individual consumer. It does not delve into other perspectives, such as the role of the USPS in mitigating these scams or the broader systemic issues with data brokers. While it provides a comprehensive guide for consumers, it omits potential countermeasures or responses from institutions like the USPS or data broker companies, which could provide a more balanced view of the issue.

The article is well-structured and uses clear, straightforward language to explain the complex process of change-of-address scams. The step-by-step breakdown of how the scam works and the detailed prevention tips are logically organized and easy to follow. The tone is neutral and informative, which aids in comprehension. However, some sections could benefit from additional examples or case studies to further illustrate the points made.

The article primarily relies on Kurt 'CyberGuy' Knutsson as the expert source, whose credibility in the tech journalism field lends some authority. However, it lacks a diversity of sources, particularly from official institutions like the USPS or cybersecurity experts who might provide additional insights or corroboration. The reliance on a single expert limits the breadth of perspectives and depth of authority in the reporting.

The article does not explicitly disclose the methodology or sources of its claims, such as statistics or studies that might support the prevalence and impact of change-of-address scams. While it provides practical advice, the lack of transparency regarding how these recommendations were developed or tested limits the reader's ability to assess their validity. Additionally, any potential conflicts of interest, such as affiliations with recommended services, are not disclosed.