Wall Street bigwigs think it’s too early to dive back into stock market — despite tariffs pause

New York Post - Apr 11th, 2025

President Trump announced a halt to his global tariff war, leading to a significant surge in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which rose nearly 3,000 points. However, the excitement was short-lived as a third of the gains were lost the following day. This fluctuation in the market reflects the persistent concerns over the 10% levies that remain in place worldwide and the ongoing fears of a global recession. Wall Street executives and money managers had anticipated this shift, citing pressure from the bond market as a catalyst for Trump's decision. They predicted that Trump would rely on Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, a former associate of George Soros, to steer trade negotiations, sidelining more hawkish advisors.

Despite the initial optimism, experts warn that the market still faces significant challenges. The underlying issues, such as overvalued stocks and substantial national debt, have not been resolved. The bond market's reaction to the tariff pause indicates that investors remain cautious. While some beaten-down stocks may appear attractive, the broader market is still considered overvalued. The tariff pause offers only temporary relief, and unless there is substantial economic growth or another market downturn to reset valuations, the economic outlook remains uncertain. Investors are advised to remain cautious, as the fundamental problems inherited by Trump persist, posing a risk to financial stability.

Trump Dow Jones Wall Street Scott Bessent George Soros Bond Market Tariff War Global Recession

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

5.0

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides a timely and relevant analysis of the market's reaction to President Trump's tariff decisions. It raises important questions about economic policies and investor sentiment, contributing to public discourse on these issues. However, the article's accuracy is moderate due to a lack of direct sourcing and verification of key claims. While it presents a coherent narrative, the absence of diverse perspectives and transparency in sourcing limits its overall reliability. The technical nature of the content may also challenge readers unfamiliar with financial markets, impacting engagement and readability. Despite these limitations, the article successfully highlights the complexities and uncertainties of current economic policies, offering valuable insights for informed readers.

Accuracy

The article makes several factual claims that require verification. For instance, it asserts that President Trump posted on social media saying, 'THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!!' before halting tariffs, which needs verification for exact timing and wording. The claim about the Dow surging nearly 3,000 points after the announcement and then losing a third of those gains also requires confirmation with market data. Additionally, the article mentions 10% tariffs remaining worldwide and a 145% effective tariff rate on China, which should be cross-verified with official tariff rates. These elements indicate a moderate level of factual accuracy, as some claims are verifiable, but others lack direct source support.

Balance

The article presents a predominantly critical perspective on the market's reaction to Trump's tariff decisions, focusing on investor skepticism and underlying economic issues. While it acknowledges Trump's actions and potential economic strategies, it largely emphasizes the negative aspects, such as market overvaluation and debt concerns. The narrative could benefit from presenting more diverse viewpoints, such as those of economists or policymakers who might see the tariff pause as a positive step. Overall, the article provides some balance by referencing different market opinions but leans towards a critical stance.

Clarity

The article is generally clear in its language and structure, presenting a coherent narrative about the market's reaction to Trump's tariff decisions. It logically follows the sequence of events and investor reactions, making it relatively easy to follow. However, the inclusion of complex financial concepts, such as market valuations and bond market dynamics, may challenge readers unfamiliar with these topics. The tone remains neutral, focusing on factual reporting rather than sensationalism.

Source quality

The article relies heavily on unnamed sources, such as 'Wall Street execs and money managers,' without providing specific attributions or credentials. It mentions George Soros and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, but these references are not directly linked to current statements or actions, reducing their credibility. The lack of direct quotes or citations from authoritative sources weakens the overall reliability of the information presented. The article would benefit from more transparent sourcing to enhance its credibility.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in terms of sourcing and methodology. It does not clearly disclose the basis for its claims, such as how the information from investors was obtained or which specific data supports the market analysis. There is no clear explanation of potential conflicts of interest or biases that might affect the reporting. The absence of detailed context or methodology makes it difficult for readers to assess the impartiality and accuracy of the information.