Vanderbilt powers to 52-point rout of The Citadel

Deadspin - Dec 18th, 2024
Open on Deadspin

Vanderbilt dominated The Citadel with a decisive 105-53 victory in Nashville, led by Devin McGlockton's 19 points and eight rebounds. The Commodores, with a record of 10-1, never trailed in the game and showcased a 35-2 advantage in points off turnovers while shooting 55.9% from the field. This win marked a season high in points scored and a season low in points allowed for Vanderbilt, who surpassed its win total from last season and extended its winning streak to four games. Additional contributions came from Jason Edwards with 19 points, AJ Hoggard with 13 points and eight assists, and Tyler Nickel with 11 points. The Citadel's Colby McAllister led his team with 15 points. The Bulldogs struggled with turnovers and three-point shooting, committing 20 turnovers and hitting just 7 of 26 from beyond the arc. Vanderbilt established dominance early with a 28-6 opening run and maintained control throughout, leading 49-21 at halftime.

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.6
Fair Story
Consider it well-founded

The article provides a detailed account of a basketball game between Vanderbilt and The Citadel, highlighting key performances and statistics. While it offers a factual and clear narrative of the game, it lacks depth in terms of source citation and transparency regarding the publication's affiliations or potential conflicts of interest.

RATING DETAILS

8
Accuracy

The article accurately reports the game statistics and outcomes, such as player performances and the final score. However, it does not provide external verification or sources for the data presented.

7
Balance

The article focuses heavily on Vanderbilt's performance, which is typical for a sports recap. While it mentions The Citadel's efforts, the coverage is limited, reflecting the one-sided nature of the game.

9
Clarity

The article is well-structured and uses clear, neutral language. It effectively conveys the events of the game without emotive language or bias, making it easy to understand.

5
Source quality

The article does not cite any external sources or provide references to validate the statistics or information. It appears to rely on internal reporting or data from the game.

4
Transparency

There is no disclosure of potential conflicts of interest or affiliations that could influence the reporting. The source of the information ('Field Level Media') is mentioned, but its role or perspective is not clarified.