The story accurately reports on the occurrence of a 7.7-magnitude earthquake in Myanmar and its impact on Thailand. The details about the quake's effects, such as the death toll in Myanmar and the structural damage in Bangkok, are consistent with available information. However, some figures, like the projected death toll in Myanmar, rely on estimates, which introduces a degree of uncertainty. The involvement of the China Railway No. 10 Engineering Group and the Italian-Thai Development Public Company Limited in the collapsed building project is also well-documented, though the deletion of a related social media post suggests potential issues with transparency.

The article provides a balanced view by covering the impacts in both Myanmar and Thailand. It highlights the human element through personal stories of those affected, like Junpen Kaewnoi's account, while also addressing the broader structural and governmental responses. However, the piece focuses more on the immediate aftermath and less on the long-term implications or the perspectives of local authorities in Myanmar, which could have added depth.

The article is well-structured and clearly written, effectively conveying the gravity of the situation. It uses descriptive language to illustrate the earthquake's impact, such as the imagery of skyscrapers swaying and infinity pools overflowing. The personal stories add emotional depth, making the narrative engaging and accessible. However, the inclusion of more background information about the region's seismic activity could improve clarity for readers unfamiliar with the topic.

The article cites credible sources such as the United States Geological Survey (USGS) for earthquake details and casualty estimates. It also references statements from local officials and companies involved in the construction project. However, the reliance on a now-deleted social media post for information about the construction company introduces a potential weakness in source reliability.

The article is generally transparent in its reporting, clearly attributing information to sources like the USGS and local officials. It acknowledges the deletion of a social media post, which suggests an attempt to maintain transparency about the challenges in verifying some details. However, more context about the difficulties in obtaining information from Myanmar due to its political situation could enhance transparency.