The article is largely accurate, providing verifiable data and credible narratives to support its claims. For example, it references specific figures, such as the 370,000 Ukrainian soldiers wounded and the nearly 20,000 people who received prostheses. These figures are consistent with publicly available data on the conflict and its impact. Additionally, quotes from professionals like Hanna Revunets and Kateryna Skorohod lend credibility to the narrative. However, the article could enhance its accuracy by including more direct citations or references to official reports or studies, especially regarding the state of sexual rehabilitation in Ukraine.

The article attempts to balance personal anecdotes with expert insights, offering a well-rounded view of the issue. It highlights the challenges faced by veterans and their partners, as well as the societal barriers to discussing sexual health. However, the article primarily presents the perspectives of those advocating for change, such as sexologists and rehabilitation specialists. It would benefit from incorporating views from government officials or medical professionals who might provide contrasting or complementary insights into why sexual rehabilitation is not prioritized. This would enhance the article's balance by showcasing a wider range of perspectives.

The article is well-written, with a clear and logical structure that guides the reader through the complex topic. It effectively uses personal stories to illustrate broader issues, making the subject matter accessible and engaging. The language is mostly neutral and professional, though it occasionally employs emotive terms, particularly when discussing personal experiences. These instances do not significantly detract from the overall clarity, as they serve to humanize the narrative. The article's tone is compassionate, reflecting the sensitivity of the topic, which enhances its readability and impact.

The sources cited in the article appear credible and relevant, with input from military psychologists, sexologists, and project managers involved in veterans' rehabilitation. The article draws from firsthand accounts, interviews, and expert opinions, which are appropriately attributed. However, it could improve source quality by referencing more peer-reviewed studies or official documents to support claims, particularly regarding the absence of sexual rehabilitation protocols. Including such sources would strengthen the article's foundation and provide additional context for its assertions.

While the article provides substantial context about the challenges faced by Ukrainian veterans, it lacks full transparency in certain areas. For instance, it does not clearly disclose the potential biases or affiliations of the experts quoted, such as any connections they might have with advocacy groups. Additionally, while it mentions a study conducted by Veteran Hub, it does not provide detailed information about the methodology or potential limitations of this research. Greater transparency in these areas would enhance the reader's trust in the article's findings and conclusions.