Tyson Fury Vs. Oleksandr Usyk 2 Will Experiment With An AI Judge

Forbes - Dec 18th, 2024
Open on Forbes

The upcoming rematch between heavyweight boxing champions Oleksandr Usyk and Tyson Fury in Riyadh will feature an experimental A.I. judge for the first time. This initiative is led by Saudi powerbroker Alalshikh, who is introducing the A.I. judge through the newly acquired Ring Magazine. While the A.I.'s scores won't influence the official fight outcome, the technology promises to eliminate bias and human error, potentially marking a shift towards greater transparency in boxing scoring. The exact developer of the A.I. system remains undisclosed, though speculation points to Jabbr, a company known for providing AI-powered combat sports stats. This experiment could pave the way for broader adoption of technology in judging boxing matches, with the possibility of real-time score revelations during fights. The event has garnered attention not only for the championship stakes but also for the innovation in scoring it represents.

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

5.4
Moderately Fair
Read with skepticism

The article provides an intriguing look at the potential use of AI judges in boxing, offering both factual information and speculative insights. However, it lacks sufficient references to verify claims and leans towards promotional language.

RATING DETAILS

6
Accuracy

The article provides some factual information about the Usyk-Fury rematch and the introduction of an AI judge. However, it lacks specific details about the AI's development and operational criteria, making it difficult to fully verify the claims.

5
Balance

The article is somewhat speculative and enthused about the potential of AI judges, with little exploration of potential drawbacks or opposing viewpoints. It lacks a balanced perspective on how AI could affect boxing.

7
Clarity

The language and structure are generally clear and easy to follow, though the article occasionally veers into promotional language and speculation, which could confuse the reader regarding the factual basis of the claims.

4
Source quality

The article does not cite any authoritative sources to support its claims about the AI judge or its development. It relies heavily on unnamed sources and speculation, reducing the credibility of the information presented.

5
Transparency

The article mentions Alalshikh's purchase of Ring Magazine, suggesting a potential conflict of interest, but does not provide any detailed disclosure or transparency regarding affiliations or potential biases.