Trust in US media hit an all-time low in 2024. New survey shows Black midwesterners have found other sources

In 2024, a Gallup report highlighted a significant decline in Americans' trust in media, with distrust levels rising from 6% in 1972 to between 33% and 39% by 2024. This decline is more severe in the U.S. compared to other countries. The article explores how Black communities perceive traditional news outlets as often portraying them inaccurately, leading to a shift towards alternative sources of information. Research indicates that 'trusted messengers,' often community members or social media influencers, have emerged as reliable news sources within these communities. These trusted messengers, such as politicians, activists, and journalists, are recognized for their visibility, consistency, and willingness to take stances on issues. However, challenges exist in the variability of the quality of information they provide. The article suggests that both journalists and community-based trusted messengers could improve news quality by collaborating and adhering to journalistic standards to better serve their communities.
RATING
The article provides an in-depth exploration of the decline in trust in media, particularly within Black communities in the Midwest. It highlights the role of trusted messengers and news influencers, presenting a balanced view with relevant data and insights from research. However, the article could benefit from more explicit sourcing and transparency regarding potential biases.
RATING DETAILS
The article presents factual data from reputable sources like Gallup and Pew. It accurately reflects the decline in media trust and the role of news influencers. However, some claims could be better supported with additional references.
The article covers multiple perspectives, including those of Black communities and trusted messengers. It addresses both the issues within traditional media and the emerging role of influencers. However, it could further explore opposing views or challenges faced by these new sources.
The article is well-structured and uses clear, neutral language. It logically presents information and avoids emotive terms, making it easy to follow and understand.
The article cites credible sources such as Gallup and Pew, enhancing its reliability. However, it could improve by providing more detailed attribution for statements and ensuring all claims are supported by high-quality sources.
The article lacks explicit disclosure of potential conflicts of interest or affiliations that might influence the reporting. Greater transparency about the author's background and potential biases would enhance credibility.
YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

There's no neutral language to describe horrific actions
Score 5.4
The anatomy of an NPR headline
Score 8.6
The Rise Of News Influencers: How They’re Reshaping Traditional Media
Score 7.2
Veteran Fox News anchor and Trump target Neil Cavuto signs off after 3 decades at network
Score 7.2