Trump's support is dropping nationwide and across demographics, polls show

Los Angeles Times - Apr 28th, 2025

President Trump's approval ratings have sharply declined 100 days into his second term, reaching levels similar to the lowest points during his first presidency. Polling data from several research firms, including Pew Research Center, YouGov, Ipsos/Reuters, and others, indicate a significant drop in support due to his handling of economic policies and potential constitutional confrontations with the judiciary. Notably, Trump's approval on the economy, a former stronghold, has fallen to 37%, with widespread disapproval of his tariff strategies and efforts to shrink government size. The Pew poll shows 59% disapproval of his job performance, with only 40% approving, marking a historic low for modern presidents at this stage, except for Trump himself previously.

The implications of Trump's decreasing approval are significant, revealing dissatisfaction across various demographic groups and swing constituencies crucial to his electoral success. Analysts highlight that actions like the global trade war and defying court orders on immigration issues contradict the reasons many voters supported him, such as economic revitalization and reduced immigration. The narrative of a chaotic and overreaching presidency is prevailing, with concerns about Trump's adherence to judicial rulings and his perceived excess of executive power. These developments underscore the challenges facing the administration in maintaining public confidence and political leverage moving forward.

Donald Trump Economic Policy Republican Party Tariffs Pew Research Center Polling Data Approval Ratings Constitutional Issues

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.6

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a comprehensive analysis of President Trump's declining approval ratings, supported by data from reputable polling organizations and insights from political experts. Its strengths lie in its clarity, timeliness, and use of credible sources, which contribute to a well-rounded understanding of the issue. However, the article could benefit from greater transparency in polling methodologies and a more balanced presentation of perspectives, including those from Trump's supporters or administration. Overall, the article effectively informs readers about the current political landscape and the factors influencing public opinion, while maintaining a neutral and accessible tone.

Accuracy

The article presents a detailed account of President Trump's approval ratings and the factors contributing to their decline. It cites specific polling data, such as the Pew poll showing a 59% disapproval rate and a 40% approval rate. These figures align with typical polling results reported by reputable sources like Pew Research. The article also mentions other polls from YouGov, Ipsos/Reuters, and Fox News, which further support the claim of declining approval ratings. However, while the story accurately reflects these polls, it would benefit from more direct citations or links to the original data for full verifiability. The historical comparison with previous presidents' approval ratings adds context, although it would be strengthened by additional references to historical data.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on the decline in President Trump's approval ratings, largely attributing this to his policies and their reception among various demographic groups. While it includes insights from political analysts like Jocelyn Kiley and Whit Ayres, the article could improve its balance by incorporating perspectives from Trump's supporters or administration officials to provide a more rounded view. The narrative leans towards highlighting negative aspects of Trump's policies without equally exploring potential positive impacts, which may present a skewed perspective.

Clarity

The article is well-written, with a clear structure that logically presents the decline in Trump's approval ratings and the contributing factors. The language is straightforward and accessible, making it easy for readers to follow the narrative. The use of direct quotes from experts adds clarity to the analysis, and the historical comparisons provide useful context. Overall, the article maintains a neutral tone, which aids in conveying the information objectively.

Source quality

The article references reputable sources such as Pew Research Center and Ipsos/Reuters, known for their reliable polling data. It also includes expert opinions from seasoned analysts, adding credibility to the narrative. However, the article could enhance its source quality by providing more direct access to the original poll data and including a broader range of sources, such as academic studies or independent analysts, to diversify the viewpoints presented.

Transparency

The article provides transparency in terms of the polling organizations and experts it cites, which helps readers understand the basis of its claims. However, it lacks detailed explanations of the polling methodologies used, such as sample sizes and margin of error, which are crucial for assessing the reliability of the data. Additionally, the article could be more transparent about the potential biases or limitations of the polls cited, which would aid in evaluating the impartiality of the findings.