Trump’s lawyers allege juror misconduct in latest bid to get his hush money conviction dismissed

Boston Herald - Dec 17th, 2024

President-elect Donald Trump's lawyers are attempting to overturn his conviction related to a hush money payment by alleging juror misconduct. They claim to have evidence of misconduct during the trial but have not provided details. Manhattan prosecutors argue these allegations are unsworn and unsupported hearsay, accusing Trump's team of trying to undermine the verdict. Trump's lawyers are also opposing a hearing to examine these claims, citing potential interference with his transition into office. The case involves Trump's conviction for concealing a $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election. Despite Trump's repeated efforts to dismiss the case, including citing presidential immunity, the court has maintained the conviction. The defense and prosecution are exploring next steps, with prosecutors suggesting options that preserve the verdict while accommodating Trump's presidency.

Trump Juror Misconduct Hush Money Legal Battle Presidential Transition

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.0

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a detailed account of the legal proceedings surrounding Donald Trump's efforts to overturn his hush money conviction. While the article covers multiple perspectives, notably from Trump's legal team and the prosecutors, it lacks citations from independent sources, which could enhance its credibility. The language is clear, but greater transparency regarding the origins of certain claims would improve the article's reliability.

Accuracy

The article appears accurate in its description of events and legal statements, but it lacks specific citations or references to documents or external sources, which makes it difficult to independently verify the claims.

Balance

The article presents viewpoints from both Trump's lawyers and the prosecutors, providing a balanced view of the legal arguments. However, it could further benefit from additional independent expert opinions.

Clarity

The article is well-organized and written in clear language, allowing readers to follow the narrative easily. It avoids overly emotive language and maintains a neutral tone.

Source quality

The article relies primarily on statements from involved parties, such as Trump's legal team and the prosecutors. Including citations from independent legal experts or documents would strengthen the source quality.

Transparency

While the article reports on the legal proceedings and includes redacted details, it does not provide full transparency regarding the evidence or sources of certain claims, limiting the reader's ability to fully assess the situation.