Trump revokes security clearances of former opponents Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton

Fox News - Mar 22nd, 2025

President Donald Trump has revoked the security clearances of several prominent figures, including Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Kamala Harris, citing national interest. The White House memo, released on Friday, names individuals who have either criticized or acted against Trump. The list includes members of Biden's family and other political opponents. This move follows Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's earlier action to block these figures' access to classified information. Additionally, Trump has withdrawn Secret Service protection from Hunter and Ashley Biden, citing taxpayer expense.

The revocation of security clearances and Secret Service protection underscores the heightened political tensions between Trump and his opponents. This development reflects ongoing disputes over access to classified information and government resources. The individuals affected have largely dismissed these actions, viewing them as a continuation of previous revocations. Critics argue that these measures are politically motivated, raising questions about the implications for national security and the norms of former presidents' conduct. The situation adds another layer to the complex political landscape and could have lasting impacts on the relationships between current and former government officials.

Donald Trump Kamala Harris Joe Biden Hillary Clinton Political Tensions Security Clearances Secret Service Protection

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

4.4

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article covers a highly relevant and controversial topic, touching on the use of executive power to revoke security clearances and Secret Service protection for political figures. However, it suffers from significant accuracy issues, particularly with incorrect claims and a lack of authoritative sources. The balance is skewed, as it presents mainly one perspective without sufficient counterpoints or expert analysis. While the story is timely and of public interest, its potential impact is diminished by the lack of depth and transparency. The article is readable and engaging due to its controversial nature, but the absence of detailed context and explanation limits its overall quality and reliability.

Accuracy

The story makes several factual claims that require verification, such as the assertion that President Donald Trump revoked the security clearances of various political figures, including Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. The accuracy of this claim depends on legal and procedural context, which the article does not provide. The mention of Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence is factually incorrect, as she has never held this position. Additionally, the story claims that Trump stripped Hunter and Ashley Biden of Secret Service protection, which would require legal authority that is not detailed in the article.

Balance

The article predominantly presents the actions of President Trump without providing balanced viewpoints from the affected individuals or legal experts. While it includes some reactions from those whose clearances were allegedly revoked, such as dismissive social media posts, it lacks a comprehensive representation of opposing perspectives or expert analysis on the implications of these actions.

Clarity

The article is reasonably clear in its language and structure, presenting the main claims in a straightforward manner. However, the lack of detailed explanations and context can lead to confusion about the legality and implications of the actions described. The tone is neutral, but the absence of supporting details affects the overall clarity.

Source quality

The article appears to rely heavily on statements supposedly made by Trump and social media reactions. It lacks references to authoritative sources or official documents that would substantiate the claims made. The absence of credible sources or links to official statements and the reliance on potentially biased social media posts undermine the reliability of the reporting.

Transparency

The article does not provide sufficient context or explanation of the legal and procedural basis for revoking security clearances or Secret Service protection. It lacks transparency regarding the sources of its information and does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest or biases that might affect the reporting. The reader is left without a clear understanding of how these actions align with existing laws and regulations.