Trump Reportedly Seeks Wartime Authority To Ramp Up Deportations Amid Setbacks

Forbes - Mar 13th, 2025

President Donald Trump plans to invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to accelerate his goal of executing the largest deportation operation in U.S. history. The Trump administration, facing resource and diplomatic challenges, is reportedly frustrated with deportation setbacks. By targeting Venezuelan crime group Tren de Aragua, Trump may argue an 'invasion' or 'incursion' under the act. However, implementation remains uncertain as the law typically applies to countries the U.S. is at war with, and legal experts predict challenges to this unprecedented use.

The implications of invoking the Alien Enemies Act are significant, potentially setting a new precedent in immigration enforcement and raising questions about executive power. Critics argue it would be a 'staggering abuse' that might face judicial scrutiny. Deportation rates under Trump have fallen behind those during the Biden administration, yet border crossings have decreased. The Trump administration's push for mass deportations faces logistical and budgetary constraints, with ICE operations needing congressional funding to maintain current levels, highlighting the complex dynamics of immigration policy in the U.S.

Tren De Aragua Donald Trump Ice Homeland Security Deportation Immigration Policy Alien Enemies Act

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a timely and engaging discussion on the Trump administration's immigration policies, focusing on the potential invocation of the Alien Enemies Act. It is generally clear and well-structured, with a balanced representation of perspectives, though it would benefit from more direct quotes and official statements. The story's accuracy is somewhat compromised by a factual error regarding the year of the Alien Enemies Act and speculative claims about its application. While the article effectively addresses a topic of significant public interest, further transparency and verification of certain claims would enhance its credibility and reliability. Overall, the story succeeds in sparking discussion about a controversial issue with potential legal and ethical ramifications.

Accuracy

The story accurately reports on President Trump's intention to invoke the Alien Enemies Act to accelerate deportations, but it incorrectly references the year of the act as 1978 instead of 1798. This is a significant factual error that affects the story's credibility. The story also claims that Trump could target Venezuelan crime groups under this act, which is speculative and requires further verification. The article mentions deportation rates and logistical challenges, which align with available data, but the legal basis for using the Alien Enemies Act in this context is not fully substantiated.

Balance

The article provides a balanced view by including various perspectives on the Trump administration's deportation plans. It mentions the administration's intentions, the legal challenges, and the reactions from different stakeholders, such as former ICE officials and legal experts. However, the story could include more perspectives from those directly affected by these policies, such as immigrant advocacy groups or individuals facing deportation, to provide a more comprehensive view.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, with a logical flow of information. It effectively breaks down complex legal concepts and government actions into understandable terms for the reader. However, the incorrect reference to the Alien Enemies Act as being from 1978 could cause confusion, and the speculative nature of some claims might detract from overall clarity.

Source quality

The story cites multiple reputable sources, including CNN, the New York Times, and NBC News, which enhances its credibility. However, it relies heavily on unnamed sources for some of its claims, such as the plans to invoke the Alien Enemies Act, which may affect the reliability of the information. The article could benefit from more direct quotes or official statements to strengthen its claims.

Transparency

The article provides some context for the Trump administration's deportation efforts and the legal framework of the Alien Enemies Act. However, it lacks transparency in explaining the methodology behind some of its claims, such as how the administration plans to implement the act or the specific legal hurdles involved. More detailed explanations and disclosures about the sources of information would improve the transparency of the story.