Trump mulls semiconductor levies after lifting reciprocal tariffs on electronics

Npr - Apr 13th, 2025

The Trump administration is exploring the imposition of new tariffs on semiconductors, a move announced by President Trump on social media as part of a larger National Security Tariff Investigation. This investigation, launched under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, seeks to determine whether the lack of U.S. semiconductor manufacturing poses a threat to national security. Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, emphasized the critical role semiconductors play in defense equipment and compared the potential tariffs to existing 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum. The administration's focus on semiconductors follows the recent lifting of tariffs on certain electronics, though Chinese technology continues to face significant tariffs due to its role in the international drug trade.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick clarified that the current exemptions on electronic tariffs are temporary and are expected to be replaced by the upcoming semiconductor tariffs. The proposed tariffs aim to encourage on-shoring of semiconductor manufacturing to reduce reliance on foreign imports, particularly from China, which is currently the largest supplier of electronic products to the U.S. The move could have significant implications for industries reliant on semiconductors, such as automotive and consumer electronics, potentially affecting global supply chains and trade relations, especially with key suppliers like China, Taiwan, and Malaysia.

National Security Trump Administration Howard Lutnick U.S. China Trade Kevin Hassett Semiconductor Tariffs Section 232 Trade Expansion Act Of 1962

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.2

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a clear and timely report on the Trump administration's consideration of semiconductor tariffs, highlighting the national security concerns and potential economic impacts. It effectively uses authoritative sources within the administration but could benefit from a broader range of perspectives to enhance balance and engagement. While the article is generally accurate and well-structured, additional context on the implications of Section 232 and independent expert analysis would further strengthen its quality. Overall, the story is informative and relevant, contributing to ongoing discussions about trade policy and national security.

Accuracy

The story accurately reports on the Trump administration's consideration of new semiconductor tariffs and the related investigation under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. It correctly mentions that semiconductors are crucial for national security and highlights the administration's concerns about the reliance on foreign imports, particularly from China. However, the article could further detail the specific tariff rates and the exact timeline for implementation, as these are critical for assessing the factual accuracy. Additionally, while the story cites Kevin Hassett and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, it would benefit from more corroborative sources to strengthen its claims.

Balance

The article primarily presents the perspective of the Trump administration and its officials, such as Kevin Hassett and Howard Lutnick. While it provides insight into the administration's rationale for the tariffs, it lacks viewpoints from industry experts, economists, or representatives from countries that might be affected by these tariffs. Including such perspectives would offer a more balanced view and help readers understand the broader implications of the proposed tariffs.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and clearly presents the main points regarding the potential semiconductor tariffs. It uses straightforward language and provides a logical flow of information, making it accessible to readers. However, the inclusion of more background information on Section 232 and its implications could improve clarity for readers unfamiliar with trade law.

Source quality

The article cites credible sources within the Trump administration, including statements from Kevin Hassett and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. These sources are authoritative on the topic, given their roles in economic policy-making. However, the article could improve by incorporating independent experts or analysts to provide a more comprehensive view and verify the claims made by government officials.

Transparency

The article is relatively transparent in disclosing the sources of its information, such as direct quotes from administration officials. However, it could be more explicit about the methodology behind the proposed tariffs and the investigation process under Section 232. Providing more context on the potential impact of these tariffs and any conflicts of interest would enhance transparency.