Trump cuts Energy Star program that saved households $450 a year

The Verge - May 7th, 2025

The Trump administration is planning to shut down the Energy Star program, a move that could significantly impact American homeowners by increasing their energy costs. Energy Star, established in 1992, has been instrumental in helping consumers save an average of $450 annually on energy bills through its appliance efficiency labeling. The program also offers tax credits and rebates, further enhancing its financial benefits. Steven Nadel from the American Council for Energy Efficiency criticized the decision, indicating it would substantially raise families' energy expenses. EPA sources have confirmed that discussions are underway to eliminate departments overseeing Energy Star, though direct comments on the program's future remain unaddressed.

The potential closure of Energy Star is seen as a significant organizational shift within the EPA, as revealed in future restructuring plans that eliminate several key offices. Energy Star, a public-private initiative, has historically saved over $500 billion in energy costs, demonstrating a high return on investment for the government. The move to dismantle it has raised concerns among environmental and energy efficiency advocates, who argue that it undermines efforts to conserve natural resources and reduce consumer costs. The program's elimination could mark a shift in national priorities, emphasizing the administration's approach to energy policy and environmental regulation.

Trump Administration Epa Energy Efficiency Energy Star Paula Glover Steven Nadel

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.2

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a timely and relevant examination of the potential closure of the Energy Star program, highlighting its financial and environmental implications. It draws on credible sources and expert opinions to underscore the program's benefits. However, the article could improve by including more diverse perspectives, particularly from those supporting the closure. While the article is clear and engaging, additional transparency regarding the data and methodology would enhance its credibility. Overall, it serves as a solid introduction to the topic, though further exploration of opposing viewpoints and financial specifics would provide a more comprehensive understanding.

Accuracy

The article appears to be largely accurate but requires verification of certain claims. It accurately states that the Trump administration is considering shutting down the Energy Star program, a point supported by reports from CNN and The Washington Post, though direct confirmation from the EPA is not explicitly cited. The claim that Energy Star saves homeowners an average of $450 annually and has saved over $500 billion since its inception aligns with general data about the program's impact, but specific figures should be cross-referenced with official statistics. The mention of rebates and tax credits up to $3,200 annually also requires precise verification, as this can vary by state and program specifics.

Balance

The article provides viewpoints from both critics and supporters of the Energy Star program. It includes perspectives from Steven Nadel of the American Council for Energy Efficiency and Paula Glover of the Alliance to Save Energy, both of whom support the program. However, it lacks direct quotes or perspectives from those within the Trump administration or opposing viewpoints that might justify the potential closure. This creates a slight imbalance, as the article leans more towards defending the program without exploring counterarguments.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, making it easy to understand. It presents the potential closure of the Energy Star program and its implications in a straightforward manner. The language is neutral and informative, though the inclusion of more specific details or data could enhance comprehension. The article maintains a logical flow, moving from the main claim to supporting evidence and expert opinions.

Source quality

The article references reputable sources such as CNN, The Washington Post, and The Verge, indicating a high level of source quality. These outlets are known for their journalistic standards and reliability. The inclusion of an EPA official, Molly Vaseliou, adds credibility, though her comments do not directly confirm the shutdown of Energy Star. The article could improve by including direct statements from Trump administration officials to bolster its claims.

Transparency

The article provides some transparency by citing its sources and including quotes from relevant stakeholders. However, it lacks a detailed explanation of the methodology behind the savings figures and the financial data presented. While the article mentions an organizational chart from the EPA, it does not provide a direct link or visual to this document for readers to verify independently.

Sources

https://www.energysage.com/news/epa-plans-to-shut-down-energystar-program/