Todd McShay reveals how Shedeur Sanders may have ruined chances of landing with Giants in NFL draft

New York Post - Apr 26th, 2025

Hints have emerged about why the New York Giants passed on drafting Colorado quarterback Shedeur Sanders. Reports indicate that a poor pre-draft interview with Giants head coach Brian Daboll contributed to the decision. According to The Ringer’s Todd McShay, Sanders was unprepared during a private meeting, which did not sit well with the Giants' leadership. As a result, Sanders, once considered a top draft pick, fell out of the first three rounds, with the Giants selecting Penn State pass rusher Abdul Carter and Ole Miss quarterback Jaxson Dart instead.

The decision to pass on Sanders highlights the importance NFL teams place on player attitude and preparation during the pre-draft process. Despite his on-field potential, Sanders' perceived flaws and demeanor may have negatively impacted his draft stock. This development underscores the significance of personal interviews in the draft process and exemplifies how off-field evaluations can influence team decisions. The Giants, meanwhile, have expressed satisfaction with their selections, emphasizing the value of their draft strategy and player assessments.

New York Giants Nfl Draft Shedeur Sanders Brian Daboll Jaxson Dart Abdul Carter Todd Mc Shay

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.6

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a timely and engaging discussion on the reasons behind Shedeur Sanders' draft position. It effectively captures the intrigue surrounding the NFL draft and the decision-making processes of teams like the Giants. However, the story's accuracy and balance are somewhat compromised by a lack of direct evidence and diverse perspectives. While it leverages credible sources like Todd McShay, it fails to include input from Sanders or the Giants, which would enhance its reliability and depth. The article's clarity and readability are strong, making it accessible to a wide audience, but greater transparency regarding sources and methodology would improve its overall quality. Despite these limitations, the story remains relevant and thought-provoking, particularly for those interested in sports management and player evaluations.

Accuracy

The article makes several claims about Shedeur Sanders' pre-draft interactions and the reasons for his draft position. It reports on an interview with Todd McShay, who suggests Sanders had a poor meeting with Giants coach Brian Daboll. This claim is supported by McShay's reputation as a credible NFL analyst. However, the article lacks direct quotes from Sanders or the Giants confirming these details, which affects the verifiability of the claims. The story also mentions a general sentiment from NFL sources, but does not provide specific evidence or quotes from these sources. Therefore, while the article presents plausible scenarios, it lacks comprehensive source support and leaves some claims needing further verification.

Balance

The article primarily presents the perspective of the Giants and NFL insiders, focusing on the reasons why Sanders may have been passed over. It lacks a balanced representation as it does not include Sanders' or his representatives' viewpoints. The article could have provided a more balanced perspective by including statements from Sanders or his team regarding the pre-draft process and his reaction to the draft outcome. This omission creates an imbalance, as readers are left with a one-sided narrative.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and easy to follow, with a logical flow of information. It effectively outlines the sequence of events leading to the Giants' decision-making in the draft. However, the story could improve clarity by providing more background on Sanders' college performance and why he was initially considered a top draft pick. This additional context would help readers better understand the significance of the claims made in the article.

Source quality

The article relies on Todd McShay, a well-known NFL analyst, which lends credibility to the story. However, it lacks a diversity of sources, as it mainly cites McShay and an unnamed NFL source. The article would benefit from including more authoritative sources, such as direct statements from the Giants' management or Sanders himself. This would enhance the reliability and depth of the story, providing readers with a more comprehensive understanding of the situation.

Transparency

The article does not clearly disclose its methodology or the basis for its claims. While it references a podcast appearance by McShay, it does not provide a link or detailed context for the interview. Additionally, the article mentions NFL sources without specifying who they are or how their information was obtained. This lack of transparency makes it difficult for readers to assess the validity of the claims and understand the story's context fully.