TikTok takes on Google Maps by surfacing reviews in the comments tab

Tech Crunch - Apr 15th, 2025

TikTok is testing a new feature that brings reviews for select locations directly into the comments section of videos. This move allows users to view star ratings, written reviews, and photos for places like Central Park, eliminating the need to use Google for additional search. The feature, accessible via a new 'Reviews' tab, is part of TikTok's strategy to enhance its search capabilities, potentially impacting the experience of viewing content by adding more information.

This development is a strategic attempt by TikTok to rival Google, particularly in the areas of search and maps, which are increasingly popular among younger users. The platform has already introduced image search capabilities and advertiser-focused search solutions, indicating its ambition to dominate in these areas. Although TikTok has not confirmed a wider rollout of the reviews feature, its potential expansion could further solidify TikTok’s position as a major competitor to Google in the search market.

Tik Tok Social Media Google Search Engine Tech Crunch Reviews

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.0

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a solid overview of TikTok's new feature that surfaces reviews in the comments tab, highlighting its potential impact on user experience and competition with Google. It is timely and relevant, addressing current trends in social media and digital competition. However, the article could benefit from more detailed source attribution and transparency, as well as additional perspectives from industry experts or users. While the article is clear and accessible, it lacks depth in exploring potential ethical concerns or broader implications for privacy and consumer behavior. Overall, it serves as an informative piece on TikTok's strategic developments but could enhance its impact and engagement with more comprehensive analysis and diverse viewpoints.

Accuracy

The story accurately reports on TikTok's new feature that surfaces reviews in the comments tab, which aligns with available information. The claim that this feature is currently in testing and not universally available is consistent with reports. The description of the feature's functionality, such as the 'Reviews' tab and the ability to click on usernames, is precise and matches what is known. However, the article could benefit from more detailed data or statements from TikTok to fully verify claims about its impact on user experience and competition with Google. The lack of official comment from TikTok leaves some uncertainty regarding future rollout plans.

Balance

The article presents a balanced view by acknowledging both potential benefits and drawbacks of the new TikTok feature. It notes that while some users may find the reviews feature helpful, others might feel it clutters the user experience. However, the article could have included perspectives from industry experts or users to provide a more comprehensive view of the feature's impact. The mention of Google's perspective in 2022 adds balance by highlighting the competitive dynamics between TikTok and Google.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, with a logical flow of information. It effectively explains the new TikTok feature and its potential implications for users and competitors like Google. The language is straightforward and accessible, making the content easy to understand. However, the article could benefit from more detailed explanations or examples to enhance comprehension, particularly regarding the feature's impact on user experience and market competition.

Source quality

The article does not cite specific sources or experts, relying instead on general statements about TikTok's features and competitive landscape. While it references a Google executive's past comments, direct quotes or more detailed attribution would enhance source credibility. Including insights from TikTok or industry analysts would strengthen the article's authority and reliability. The lack of direct input from TikTok regarding the feature's rollout limits the depth of source quality.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in terms of methodology and source disclosure. It does not explain how the information was obtained or verified, and there is no mention of potential biases or conflicts of interest. While the article provides a clear description of the feature, more context on how the feature was tested or observed would improve transparency. The absence of TikTok's official comments or statements leaves readers without a clear understanding of the company's perspective.