The story presents several factual claims, notably about a ceasefire declared by Russian President Vladimir Putin, which aligns with verified reports that he announced a temporary Easter truce. However, the claim that Russian forces continued attacks immediately after the truce needs further verification, as it relies on statements from Ukrainian sources and lacks independent confirmation. Additionally, the assertion that there have been no pauses in the conflict since February 2022 requires context, as there have been various ceasefire attempts and periods of reduced hostilities. Therefore, while some claims are accurate, others need more substantiation.

The article primarily presents the viewpoint of Ukrainian sources, specifically a parliament member, regarding the continuation of attacks despite the truce. There is limited representation of the Russian perspective or any official response to these allegations. This imbalance might lead readers to perceive bias toward the Ukrainian narrative. Including perspectives from both sides or third-party observers could enhance the story's balance by providing a more comprehensive view of the situation.

The language used in the article is clear and straightforward, making it accessible to a broad audience. The structure is logical, presenting the main claims succinctly. However, the article could benefit from additional context or background information to enhance understanding, such as a brief overview of previous ceasefire attempts or the current state of the conflict.

The story cites a Ukrainian parliament member and references CNN, indicating reliance on potentially credible sources. However, the absence of direct quotes or statements from Russian officials or independent observers weakens the overall source quality. The story would benefit from a broader range of sources, including international agencies or independent conflict monitors, to corroborate the claims made.

The article lacks transparency in its sourcing and methodology. It does not provide detailed information on how the claims were verified or the context in which the statements were made. Greater transparency could be achieved by explaining the basis for the claims, such as providing direct quotes, specifying the context of the Ukrainian parliament member's statements, or detailing any efforts made to obtain responses from Russian sources.