These Rangers are missing an all-important magic trait from last season

New York Post - Apr 9th, 2025

The New York Rangers, once celebrated for their remarkable comeback victories, find themselves struggling in the 2024-25 NHL season. Despite a strong previous season with 28 comeback wins, the Rangers have only managed 15 this year, failing to win any games after trailing by two goals. This lack of resilience was evident in their recent loss to the Tampa Bay Lightning, where they conceded three goals in the first period and never recovered. Their current position is precarious, trailing six points behind the Canadiens for a playoff spot.

The Rangers' inability to replicate their past success has been compounded by a lack of offensive production and power-play effectiveness, with only two power-play goals in their last 16 games. Despite returning most of their core players, the team's struggles in both offensive and defensive zones have left them on the brink of playoff elimination. With every game now a must-win, the Rangers face a daunting challenge to secure a postseason berth, as they desperately seek to reignite their lost comeback magic.

Nhl New York Rangers Playoffs Chris Kreider Jonny Brodzinski Peter Laviolette Nikita Kucherov Mika Zibanejad

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a detailed and timely analysis of the New York Rangers' performance over two seasons, focusing on their ability to make comebacks. It is factually accurate in its depiction of the team's past successes and current challenges, although some claims require verification. The piece is balanced in presenting both achievements and struggles, though it lacks external perspectives that could enhance its depth. Source quality and transparency could be improved by citing authoritative data and disclosing the basis for player quotes and statistics. The article is engaging and clear, appealing primarily to sports fans, particularly those interested in the Rangers. While it may provoke some debate within the sports community, its impact is largely confined to that sphere. Overall, the story effectively captures the narrative of a team's fluctuating fortunes, offering insights into the dynamics of professional sports performance.

Accuracy

The story provides a detailed account of the New York Rangers' performance over two seasons, focusing on their ability to make comebacks. The factual claims, such as the Rangers winning the Presidents' Trophy with 114 points and achieving 28 comeback wins in the 2023-24 season, are specific and verifiable through official NHL records and statistics. The narrative accurately reflects the team's struggles in the 2024-25 season, noting the lack of comebacks and the failure to win when trailing by two goals. However, verification is needed for specific player quotes and the current standings to ensure complete accuracy. Overall, the story aligns well with available data, though some elements require confirmation.

Balance

The article focuses primarily on the New York Rangers' performance, offering insights into both their successes and failures. While it highlights the team's previous achievements, it also thoroughly examines their current struggles. The piece includes perspectives from players and the coach, providing a balanced view of internal sentiments. However, it lacks input from external analysts or opposing teams, which could provide additional context and balance. This omission slightly skews the narrative towards the internal perspective of the Rangers.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and uses clear language to convey the story of the Rangers' performance. The narrative flows logically from past successes to current challenges, making it easy for readers to follow. The use of specific examples and player quotes enhances understanding and engagement. However, the inclusion of more context about the broader NHL landscape and comparisons with other teams could further enhance clarity and provide a more comprehensive picture.

Source quality

The story relies heavily on team and player quotes, which are credible sources for insights into the team's dynamics. However, it does not cite external sources or statistics that could strengthen its claims. The reliance on internal sources without external verification or analysis limits the depth of the reporting. Including authoritative sources, such as NHL statistics or expert commentary, would enhance the overall credibility and reliability of the article.

Transparency

The article provides a clear narrative about the Rangers' performance but lacks transparency in terms of sourcing and methodology. It does not disclose how the information was gathered or verified, and the absence of cited sources for statistics and quotes raises questions about the basis of its claims. Greater transparency about the sources and methods used to obtain the information would improve the article's credibility and allow readers to understand the foundation of the reporting.