The hidden danger in the air that can cause infertility, colon cancer and lung problems

New York Post - Dec 18th, 2024
Open on New York Post

Researchers from UC San Francisco have found that microplastics, originating from sources like decomposing garbage and car tires, are likely contributing to health issues such as infertility, colon cancer, and respiratory illnesses. These tiny particles, smaller than a grain of rice, are being inhaled and ingested by humans and are suspected of harming reproductive, digestive, and respiratory health. The study reviewed 3,000 studies and found high-quality evidence of microplastics affecting sperm quality and the immune system, with moderate evidence of impacts on ovarian follicles, reproductive hormones, and lung function. The research highlights the growing presence of microplastics in human bodies and emphasizes the need for further research into health outcomes and reducing exposure. The findings were published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology.

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.4
Moderately Fair
Read with skepticism

The article provides a detailed overview of the potential health risks associated with microplastics, referencing a study by UCSF researchers. While it presents a significant amount of factual information, the tone is somewhat sensationalist, which may affect its overall balance and clarity.

RATING DETAILS

8
Accuracy

The article accurately reports on the findings from UCSF researchers, noting the potential health risks of microplastics. It cites a substantial number of studies reviewed and provides specific details on how microplastics can affect health. However, it lacks specific data points and references from the original study to verify all claims.

6
Balance

The article predominantly presents the perspective of the UCSF researchers without considering opposing viewpoints or the current scientific consensus. It could benefit from including counterarguments or the views of other experts in the field to provide a more balanced perspective.

6
Clarity

While the article is generally clear in its explanation of the subject, the use of emotive language like 'rubbish' and 'chunks' detracts from its neutrality. A more formal tone and structured presentation of information could improve clarity.

7
Source quality

The article references a study published in a reputable journal, Environmental Science & Technology, and quotes a UCSF professor. However, it does not provide direct links to the study or additional sources that could strengthen its credibility.

5
Transparency

The article mentions that the UCSF study relied on rodent studies but does not elaborate on the limitations of this approach. It lacks disclosure of potential conflicts of interest or funding sources related to the research, which affects its transparency.