The best streaming deals: Save on Apple TV+, Audible, Starz, Disney+ and more

Engadget - Apr 16th, 2025

As streaming services like Netflix, Disney+, and Max continue to raise their prices, consumers are seeking ways to make streaming more affordable. Engadget highlights current streaming deals that offer significant savings, such as Apple TV+ for $9 over three months or a Starz subscription at $18 for six months. These deals, often ad-supported, are usually available during major shopping events like Black Friday but can occasionally be found throughout the year.

The rising cost of streaming services has raised questions about their value, pushing consumers to be more strategic with their subscriptions. Bundles and student discounts offer additional saving opportunities, with packages like the Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ Trio Basic bundle providing substantial discounts. These options reflect the growing trend of consolidation in the streaming market, as companies seek to retain subscribers by providing more content at competitive prices. Overall, being patient and strategic can lead to significant savings in the streaming landscape.

Netflix Apple Tv+ Hulu Streaming Services Max Disney+ Starz Streaming Deals Bundles Student Discounts

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.0

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article excels in providing clear, detailed information on current streaming deals, making it a valuable resource for consumers looking to save money. Its clarity and readability are strong points, ensuring that readers can easily understand the options available to them. However, the article could benefit from greater transparency regarding its sources and methodology, as well as a more balanced perspective that includes potential downsides of streaming services and insights from the companies themselves.

While the piece is timely and relevant, addressing a topic of public interest, its impact is primarily limited to individual consumer decision-making rather than broader societal or cultural shifts. The article's engagement potential is moderate, with detailed content that encourages action but lacks interactive elements to foster discussion. The low controversy score reflects its focus on practical consumer advice rather than contentious issues.

Overall, the article serves as a useful guide for consumers but could be enhanced by incorporating more diverse perspectives, transparency, and interactive elements to increase its impact and engagement.

Accuracy

The story provides a detailed overview of various streaming deals, with specific pricing and savings information. For example, it claims Apple TV+ offers three months for $9, saving $21, and that this deal is available to new and qualifying returning subscribers until April 24. Such specific details are verifiable and add to the story's credibility. However, the article's broad claim that streaming services like Netflix and Disney have consistently raised prices lacks specific data points or historical context to support it fully. This could be a potential area needing further verification to ensure complete accuracy. Overall, while the article is largely accurate in its specific deal descriptions, it could benefit from additional data to support broader industry claims.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on the consumer benefits of streaming deals, providing a range of options for potential subscribers. However, it lacks a balanced discussion about potential downsides of streaming services, such as content limitations or quality issues with ad-supported plans. The piece could be more balanced by including perspectives on the impact of frequent price increases on consumer trust or satisfaction. Additionally, while it mentions the rarity of deals, it does not explore the reasons behind this trend from the streaming companies' perspectives, which could provide a more rounded view.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and easy to follow, with clear headings and subheadings that guide the reader through different sections. It uses straightforward language to describe each deal, making it accessible to a general audience. The logical flow from general trends in streaming pricing to specific deals helps maintain reader engagement. However, the use of abbreviations like VOD without explanation could confuse some readers unfamiliar with the term. Overall, the article's clarity is a strong point, enabling readers to quickly understand the available options.

Source quality

The article appears to be based on information likely gathered from streaming service announcements or promotional materials. However, it does not explicitly cite these sources, which could enhance its credibility. The lack of direct attribution or quotes from company representatives or industry experts limits the ability to assess the reliability of the information. Including links to official announcements or statements from streaming services would improve the story's source quality and provide readers with additional context.

Transparency

The article provides detailed information on streaming deals but lacks transparency regarding the methodology used to select these deals or the criteria for determining their value. It does not disclose any potential affiliations or partnerships with the streaming services mentioned, which could affect impartiality. Greater transparency about the selection process and any potential conflicts of interest would enhance the article's credibility and allow readers to better assess the motivations behind the recommendations.