Sydney Sweeney deletes PDA photo with fiancé Jonathan Davino as breakup rumors heat up

New York Post - Mar 25th, 2025

Sydney Sweeney, known for her roles in 'Euphoria' and 'White Lotus', has ignited breakup rumors after deleting a photo with her fiancé, Jonathan Davino, from her Instagram. The photo, originally posted in early January 2025, showed the couple in a loving embrace amidst New Year's celebrations. Despite fans noticing the removal, Sweeney has left other photos with Davino on her feed, including a group shot. This development comes on the heels of reports that the couple postponed their wedding, initially set for May, due to conflicting schedules.

The couple's relationship has been under scrutiny, especially after Sweeney was reported to be staying alone at the Beverly Hills Hotel for a month, despite owning multiple properties in Los Angeles. Meanwhile, Davino has been seen managing renovations at their Bel Air home, which the couple bought together. The absence of joint appearances since January has further fueled speculations. The situation highlights the challenges the couple faces balancing their private lives amid public attention, raising questions about the future of their relationship.

Instagram Sydney Sweeney Celebrity Relationships Jonathan Davino Euphoria White Lotus Breakup Rumors Wedding Postponed

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.0

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides a clear and engaging narrative about the rumors surrounding Sydney Sweeney and Jonathan Davino's relationship. It effectively captures the attention of readers interested in celebrity news but relies heavily on speculation and indirect evidence. The lack of transparency and authoritative sources limits the article's credibility, as it does not provide direct confirmation from the individuals involved. While timely and relevant to current discussions, the story's impact is confined to its niche audience, with limited broader societal implications. Overall, the article serves as an engaging piece for fans but falls short in delivering verified, balanced reporting.

Accuracy

The story accurately reports on the deletion of a photo by Sydney Sweeney from her Instagram, which aligns with the narrative of growing breakup rumors. The timeline of her relationship with Jonathan Davino, starting in 2018 and leading to their engagement in 2022, is consistent with other sources. However, the article does not provide direct confirmation from Sweeney or Davino regarding their relationship status, which leaves room for speculation. The mention of Sweeney staying at the Beverly Hills Hotel without Davino and the couple's property purchases are factual but require context to fully understand their implications on the relationship rumors.

Balance

The article predominantly focuses on the rumors surrounding Sweeney and Davino's relationship, potentially skewing the narrative towards speculation rather than providing a balanced view. It mentions the deletion of the Instagram photo and their living arrangements as evidence of a potential breakup but lacks input from the individuals involved or their representatives. This one-sided perspective might lead readers to draw conclusions based solely on circumstantial evidence.

Clarity

The article is written in a clear and engaging manner, making it easy for readers to follow the narrative. It provides a chronological account of events and uses straightforward language. However, the reliance on speculation and lack of direct evidence might lead to misunderstandings about the true state of Sweeney and Davino's relationship.

Source quality

The story relies on unnamed sources and observations from social media, which can be unreliable. It references TMZ, a known entertainment news outlet, but does not include direct quotes or statements from Sweeney, Davino, or their representatives. The lack of authoritative sources weakens the credibility of the claims, as the article is based on indirect evidence and speculation rather than verified information.

Transparency

The article does not clearly disclose the sources of its information or the methodology behind its claims. It mentions rumors and insider information but does not provide details on how this information was obtained or verified. The absence of transparency regarding the basis of the claims and the lack of direct statements from involved parties make it difficult for readers to assess the reliability of the content.