‘Superman’ Takes Flight In New Trailer And It Looks . . . Weird

Forbes - Jan 26th, 2025

The upcoming Superman movie directed by James Gunn is stirring mixed reactions, particularly due to the CGI effects showcased in its latest trailer. While the film is highly anticipated and marks a significant release for the struggling DC franchise, viewers, including the article's author, expressed concern over the appearance of CGI, especially in scenes depicting Superman flying, which seemed oddly artificial. Despite these reservations, the author remains hopeful for the film's success, encouraging fans to remain open-minded until the movie's release on July 11th.

This film is a pivotal moment not only for DC but also for other vast franchises like Marvel, Star Wars, Star Trek, Game of Thrones, and Lord of the Rings, all of which are seen as needing a resurgence in popularity and critical acclaim. The high expectations for Gunn's Superman are further fueled by his previous successes, notably with the first Guardians of the Galaxy movie. Yet, concerns linger about the potential over-complexity of the film's plot and the possibility of an over-saturation of Gunn's signature humor, which could detract from a coherent and engaging narrative. As the release date approaches, fans and critics alike are eager to see whether these concerns will be addressed or if the film will contribute positively to the reinvigoration of these beloved franchises.

Superman Dc Comics David Corenswet James Gunn Cgi Film Trailer Guardians Of The Galaxy

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

5.6

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article offers a personal perspective on the upcoming Superman movie, highlighting concerns about CGI quality and potential plot issues. While it provides timely commentary on a topic of public interest, its reliance on subjective observations and lack of diverse viewpoints limit its accuracy and balance. The article is engaging and readable, inviting audience interaction, but its impact on broader discussions is constrained by the absence of authoritative sources and comprehensive analysis. Overall, it serves as an informal critique rather than an in-depth examination of the film's potential.

Accuracy

The article makes several factual claims about the upcoming Superman movie, such as its release date and the involvement of James Gunn as director. These claims are verifiable and generally accurate based on available sources. However, the article's critique of the CGI quality is subjective and not easily verifiable. The author's concerns about the CGI being 'weird' or 'unfinished' are based on personal observation rather than factual evidence. Additionally, the article does not provide concrete evidence to support claims about the potential for an overly complex plot or excessive humor, which are speculative in nature.

Balance

The article primarily presents the author's personal perspective on the upcoming Superman movie, focusing on concerns about CGI and potential plot issues. While it acknowledges past successes of James Gunn, it does not provide a balanced range of viewpoints from other critics or audiences. The article could benefit from including contrasting opinions or insights from industry experts to provide a more balanced view of the film's potential.

Clarity

The language used in the article is clear and straightforward, making the author's opinions and concerns easy to understand. The structure is logical, with a progression from initial hopes for the film to specific worries about CGI and plot complexity. However, the tone is informal and subjective, which may affect the perceived neutrality of the analysis.

Source quality

The article appears to rely heavily on the author's personal observations and opinions rather than a variety of authoritative sources. There is a lack of attribution to industry experts, official statements, or other credible sources that could lend weight to the claims made. This reliance on subjective interpretation limits the article's credibility and reliability.

Transparency

The article is somewhat transparent in expressing the author's personal viewpoint and skepticism towards the film. However, it lacks a clear explanation of the methodology or criteria used to evaluate the CGI and plot concerns. The absence of detailed context or background information about the film's production or CGI process reduces transparency.