Spinner Ashwin retires from India duty

Ravichandran Ashwin, a prominent India off-spinner and the seventh-highest wicket-taker in Test history, has retired from international cricket at the age of 38. Announcing his retirement after the third Test against Australia in Brisbane, Ashwin concluded a celebrated 14-year career with India, taking 537 wickets in 106 Tests, second only to Anil Kumble among Indian bowlers, and scoring six centuries. Despite not playing in the final game, Ashwin is remembered as a modern great, particularly for his Test performances, including 37 five-wicket hauls. He also contributed in ODIs and T20s, with 156 and 72 wickets respectively. A member of the 2011 World Cup-winning squad, Ashwin will continue his cricket journey at the club level. India captain Rohit Sharma revealed Ashwin had considered retiring prior to the tour but was persuaded to continue. Ashwin's impact on Indian cricket, especially in Tests, leaves a lasting legacy.
RATING
The article provides information about Ravichandran Ashwin's retirement from international cricket. While it is well-structured and clear, it lacks source attribution, which affects its overall credibility.
RATING DETAILS
The article seems accurate in terms of statistics and facts about Ravichandran Ashwin's career. However, the retirement news should be verified from primary sources or official announcements to ensure factual accuracy.
The article mainly focuses on Ashwin's achievements and his decision to retire. It briefly mentions another perspective through Rohit Sharma's comments but could have included more viewpoints from other cricketers or analysts.
The article is well-written, with clear language and structure. It effectively communicates Ashwin's achievements and decision to retire without using emotive language.
The article does not cite any sources or references, which affects the reliability of the information provided. It is essential to attribute information to credible sources, especially when announcing retirements or career decisions.
There is no disclosure of sources or any potential conflicts of interest. The lack of source attribution makes it difficult to assess the transparency of the reporting.