Social Media Literacy Still Lacking – Could That Change?

Forbes - Feb 9th, 2025

Over three years after the National Institutes of Health proposed a framework for social media literacy, little progress has been made, highlighting a growing need for education in this area. Experts like Ashley Nelson from Tulane University and Tamara Buck from Southeast Missouri State University emphasize the importance of integrating social media literacy into educational curricula. They argue that teaching students to navigate platforms responsibly is crucial given the rise of misinformation, online harassment, and data privacy concerns. Nelson likens this education to driver's training, suggesting that guidance is necessary before allowing young users unrestricted access to social media.

The implications of social media literacy extend beyond the classroom, affecting both personal and professional realms. Nelson and Buck advocate for a proactive approach, encouraging analysis of past social media blunders and understanding potential legal ramifications. With platforms evolving rapidly, experts suggest incorporating social media literacy into existing courses to foster critical thinking. Dr. Kelly Vaughn from Notre Dame de Namur University proposes integrating these discussions into social studies, empowering students to engage with digital content thoughtfully. While education is a starting point, mastering social media literacy requires continuous practice and awareness.

Misinformation National Institutes Of Health Social Media Literacy Ashley Nelson Tamara Buck Online Safety Educational Curriculum

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.0

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article effectively highlights the importance of social media literacy and its potential integration into educational curricula. Its strengths lie in its clarity, timeliness, and relevance to public interest, addressing a significant societal issue. However, the article's impact is somewhat limited by a lack of diverse perspectives, insufficient source quality, and a need for greater transparency in its claims. While it presents expert opinions, it would benefit from more robust data and exploration of counterarguments to provide a more balanced view. Overall, the article serves as a solid introduction to the topic but requires further depth and substantiation to maximize its influence and engagement.

Accuracy

The article presents several factual claims that align with the broader discourse on social media literacy, such as the release of a framework by the National Institutes of Health and the need for incorporating social media literacy into education. However, the article lacks precise dates and specific data to substantiate the claim that 'little to no progress has been made.' The assertion about the majority of Americans relying on platforms like X, Facebook, and Instagram for news is likely true but would benefit from recent statistics. While expert opinions are cited, the article would be stronger with direct quotes or references to specific studies or reports.

Balance

The article predominantly features viewpoints supporting the integration of social media literacy into educational curricula. While it includes quotes from multiple experts, all are in favor of the initiative, suggesting a lack of counterarguments or perspectives from those who might oppose such measures. This creates an imbalance as the article does not explore potential challenges or criticisms of implementing social media literacy programs.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, with a logical flow that guides the reader through the issue of social media literacy. The language is straightforward, and the tone is neutral, making the content accessible to a broad audience. However, the inclusion of more specific examples or case studies could enhance comprehension and engagement.

Source quality

The article relies on expert opinions from individuals in academia and education, which lends some credibility. However, it lacks references to primary sources, such as the actual NIH framework or empirical studies on social media literacy. The absence of these references weakens the authority and reliability of the article's claims.

Transparency

The article does not provide sufficient transparency regarding the basis of its claims. It mentions a framework by the NIH but does not link to it or provide further details about its content. Additionally, the article does not disclose the methodology behind the experts' opinions or any potential conflicts of interest, which could affect the impartiality of the reporting.