Slot the difference - Liverpool's tactical tweaks under new boss
BBC - Dec 18th, 2024
Liverpool's transition from Jurgen Klopp to Arne Slot has been remarkably smooth, with the team winning 19 out of 23 games. Slot has adopted a more measured approach influenced by both Klopp and Pep Guardiola, as well as Roberto de Zerbi's method of playing through opposition press. The tactical changes include increased ball circulation in the defensive third, reduced shot attempts, and a more structured 4-2-4 formation. Ryan Gravenberch's shift to a 'number six' role allows Alexis Mac Allister to play further up the pitch, while Trent Alexander-Arnold has returned to a traditional right-back position, occasionally operating centrally. Mohamed Salah benefits from Slot's tactics, enhancing his offensive output. While Liverpool is in a strong position, challenges remain, such as teams exploiting their less aggressive press.
RATING
The article provides a detailed analysis of Liverpool's tactical changes under Arne Slot, with insights into specific players and strategies. However, it lacks specific source citations for the data presented, which affects its overall credibility.
RATING DETAILS
The article presents a coherent analysis of Liverpool's tactical changes and player roles, but lacks specific references to verify the statistical data mentioned, such as passes per game and PPDA. This affects the factual accuracy to some extent.
The article offers a balanced view of Liverpool's current strengths and weaknesses, discussing both successes and areas for improvement. However, it primarily focuses on Liverpool's perspective without much input from opposing teams or external analysts.
The article is well-structured and uses clear, neutral language to explain complex tactical concepts. It avoids emotive terms and remains focused on delivering a logical argument.
The article references statistics from Opta and FBref, which are reputable sources. However, it lacks direct citations or links to these data points, making it difficult for readers to verify the information independently.
While the article provides a comprehensive analysis, it does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest or the methodology behind the data presented. Greater transparency in these areas would enhance credibility.