Schumer warns any GOP bid to shutter the Department of Education will be DOA in Senate

Fox News - Mar 25th, 2025

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has strongly opposed any Republican efforts to close the Department of Education, labeling such measures as 'dead on arrival' if brought to the Senate. This response follows President Donald Trump's executive order encouraging the Secretary of Education to explore shutting down the department and transferring its responsibilities to states and local communities. Trump assured that the department's essential functions would remain intact, but Schumer emphasized that any significant changes would require congressional approval. Schumer, speaking on the Senate floor, highlighted his commitment to preventing any bill that aims to dismantle the department from advancing.

The Department of Education, established in 1980, consolidated various offices from multiple federal agencies. Schumer, who has been a legislative figure since 1981, underscored the department's importance and his intent to defend it. The move to potentially close the department reflects ongoing debates over federal versus state control in education policy. This development signals another chapter in the broader struggle between the Trump administration and Democratic leaders over education governance, with significant implications for how educational services are managed and delivered across the United States.

Donald Trump Legislation Senate Democrats Republicans Chuck Schumer Department Of Education Executive Order

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a generally accurate and timely overview of a significant political development concerning the Department of Education. It effectively captures the main viewpoints of key political figures involved, such as Chuck Schumer and Donald Trump, while maintaining clarity and readability. However, it could benefit from a more balanced representation of perspectives and a greater variety of sources, particularly expert opinions, to enhance its depth and reliability. The story's potential impact is high due to the public interest in federal education policy, though its engagement could be improved with more interactive elements or detailed analyses. Overall, the article is informative and relevant but could be strengthened by addressing these areas.

Accuracy

The story is largely accurate in its representation of the key facts, such as Chuck Schumer's statement that any attempt to dismantle the Department of Education would be 'dead on arrival.' This aligns with Schumer's public remarks and the legal reality that Congress is needed to dissolve federal departments. The article correctly notes President Trump's executive order aimed at reducing the Department's role, which is also accurate. However, the story could benefit from more detailed verification, such as the specific provisions of Trump's executive order and the potential impacts of dismantling the Department on education.

Balance

The article presents viewpoints from both Schumer and Trump, offering a basic balance of perspectives. However, it leans slightly towards Schumer's stance by giving more space to his quotes and assertions without equally exploring the rationale behind Trump's executive order. The story could improve by including more Republican perspectives or expert opinions on the potential benefits of Trump's proposal to provide a fuller picture.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and straightforward, with a logical flow that helps the reader understand the main points. The language is neutral and accessible, making the content easy to follow. However, it could benefit from more detailed explanations of complex legislative processes or the potential consequences of the executive order to enhance reader comprehension.

Source quality

The article cites statements from public figures like Chuck Schumer and references an executive order from President Trump, which are reliable primary sources. However, it lacks a broader range of sources, such as educational experts or bipartisan analysis, which would enhance the depth and reliability of the reporting. Including these would provide a more nuanced understanding of the implications of the executive order.

Transparency

While the article clearly attributes quotes to Chuck Schumer and refers to Trump's executive order, it lacks transparency in terms of explaining the methodology behind the reporting or any potential conflicts of interest. The article does not clarify the basis for some of its claims, such as the potential effects on education, which could be better supported with data or expert analysis.