Samsung's latest rugged devices are keeping old-school mobile traditions alive

Engadget - Apr 14th, 2025

Samsung has introduced two new rugged devices, the Galaxy XCover 7 Pro and Galaxy Tab Active 5 Pro, catering primarily to enterprise customers with a nostalgic touch of removable backplates and user-replaceable batteries. The Galaxy XCover 7 Pro, equipped with a Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chip and a 4,350mAh battery, includes features like Google's Circle to Search and Object Eraser. It offers enhanced durability with IP68 water and dust resistance, MIL-STD-810H certification, and programmable buttons. Meanwhile, the Galaxy Tab Active 5 Pro, featuring a 10.1-inch screen and the same chip, boasts versatile charging options, including the ability to operate without a battery when docked, and hot-swapping capabilities.

This move by Samsung highlights the niche revival of user-friendly features that were once standard. Despite the trend of sleeker flagship phones, these devices cater to a specific market that values customization and durability over aesthetics. Both devices are set for release in May and June 2025, respectively, illustrating a shift in Samsung's approach to meet the needs of enterprise clients and perhaps suggesting a broader consumer desire for practicality over form. This development underscores the ongoing tension between cutting-edge technology and user-preferred practicality in the smartphone industry.

Samsung Galaxy X Cover 7 Pro Galaxy Tab Active 5 Pro Rugged Devices Enterprise Technology User Replaceable Batteries

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a clear and timely overview of Samsung's new rugged devices, focusing on features that may appeal to niche markets. It excels in clarity and timeliness, offering detailed descriptions that are easy to understand. However, it lacks transparency and source attribution, which affects its overall credibility. The balance of perspectives could be improved by including potential drawbacks or comparisons with other products. While the article is unlikely to provoke controversy, it does highlight the return of user-replaceable batteries, which could spark discussions about consumer rights and sustainability. Overall, the story is informative and well-structured, but could benefit from more comprehensive sourcing and context.

Accuracy

The article provides accurate information about Samsung's new rugged devices, including the Galaxy XCover 7 Pro and the Galaxy Tab Active 5 Pro. It correctly describes features like removable backplates, user-replaceable batteries, and the use of the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chip. The mention of IP68 water and dust resistance and MIL-STD-810H certification aligns with standard rugged device specifications. However, there are areas needing verification, such as the specific AI features included and pricing details, which are not mentioned in the article. The release dates are clearly stated, but further confirmation from official sources would enhance verifiability.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on the technical features and benefits of the new Samsung devices, which may lead to a slight imbalance in perspective. It highlights the durability and customization options, which could appeal to users valuing these aspects. However, it lacks a comprehensive view that might include potential drawbacks or comparisons with competitor products. The mention of these devices being niche suggests a limited target audience, but the article could benefit from exploring broader consumer perspectives or industry expert opinions.

Clarity

The article is clear and concise, providing a straightforward overview of the new Samsung devices. The language is accessible, and technical terms are explained in a way that is understandable to a general audience. The structure is logical, with a progression from features to specifications and availability. The tone is neutral, focusing on factual descriptions without unnecessary jargon or bias. This clarity aids in reader comprehension and engagement with the content.

Source quality

The article does not explicitly cite sources, which affects the assessment of source quality. While it provides detailed specifications and features, the lack of attribution to Samsung's official announcements or other authoritative sources limits the evaluation of reliability. Including direct quotes from Samsung representatives or references to press releases would enhance credibility. The article's reliance on general knowledge about Samsung's product line and industry standards suggests a moderate level of source quality.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in terms of source attribution and methodology. It presents information about the devices without disclosing the basis for the claims or the process of gathering the details. The absence of links to official announcements or direct statements from Samsung affects the transparency of the reporting. Providing context about the competitive landscape or historical trends in rugged devices would also improve transparency and help readers understand the significance of these new products.