Roku Ultra (2024) review: Too much of the same

The Roku Ultra (2024) has been refreshed with notable upgrades including a 30% speed increase, machine learning for app prediction, and smart home integrations, all while maintaining the same $99 price tag. The design remains largely unchanged, but it offers improved performance with 4K HDR support, HDMI 2.1 compatibility, and Wi-Fi 6. Despite its lack of Matter support, it provides a robust streaming experience with access to a wide range of apps and free content, although users may still encounter ads. The new model also features the second-generation Roku Voice Remote Pro with backlit buttons and USB-C charging.
RATING
The article provides a comprehensive review of the Roku Ultra (2024), covering various aspects such as design, performance, and smart home integration. It is informative and detailed but could benefit from more explicit sourcing and additional perspectives.
RATING DETAILS
The article appears to provide accurate information about the Roku Ultra (2024) based on the features and comparisons made with similar products. However, specific claims like the 30% speed increase are not backed by external sources or data, which slightly affects the accuracy.
The article mainly presents the reviewer's perspective with minimal acknowledgment of differing opinions or broader market analysis. It would benefit from including more viewpoints to provide a balanced perspective on the product's standing in the market.
The article is well-structured and easy to understand. It avoids overly technical jargon and maintains a neutral tone for the most part, although some phrases like 'definitely something to get excited about (and totally fear internally)' introduce unnecessary emotive language.
The article does not cite any external sources or experts, relying solely on the author's observations and experiences. This affects the credibility and reliability of the information, as readers have no way to verify the claims made.
While the article is detailed in its review, it lacks transparency regarding potential conflicts of interest or affiliations. It does not disclose whether the author received the product for free or if there are any business relationships with Roku.