The article primarily presents motivational content rather than factual information. It is filled with subjective claims about achieving a 'greater' life, often tied to religious beliefs. For example, the article references a biblical quote (John 14:12) to support its points, but this is more interpretive rather than factual. The article lacks data, statistics, or external evidence to substantiate its claims, such as the impact of choosing a single word for the New Year or the tangible outcomes of adopting such a mindset. Therefore, while the article is internally consistent with its theme, it does not provide verifiable facts or evidence to support its assertions.

The article exhibits a strong bias towards a Christian perspective, specifically emphasizing faith in God and religious growth. It does not present alternative viewpoints or consider individuals who may not share these beliefs. The repeated emphasis on religious themes, such as the role of God in achieving a 'greater' life, suggests a lack of balance. The article could have been improved by including secular approaches to self-improvement or highlighting diverse beliefs about personal growth. As it stands, it caters primarily to a specific audience, thereby limiting its broader appeal and balance in representing different perspectives.

The article is well-written in terms of clarity, with a straightforward and engaging style that is easy to follow. The structure is logical, with a clear progression of ideas centered around the theme of achieving a 'greater' life. The language is inspirational and motivational, which suits the purpose of the article. However, the use of emotive language, such as 'God wants to develop your capacity,' could be seen as persuasive rather than neutral, potentially detracting from the professional tone. Despite this, the article communicates its message effectively and is accessible to a wide audience, particularly those who resonate with its religious undertones.

The article does not reference any external sources or studies to support its claims. It relies heavily on the author's interpretations and religious texts, such as the Bible, which may not be considered credible or authoritative in all contexts. There is no attempt to provide a variety of sources or evidence to substantiate the arguments made. The article would benefit from citing research or expert opinions on the effectiveness of motivational practices or the psychological impact of adopting a single word for the New Year. The absence of such sources diminishes the article's credibility and depth.

The article lacks transparency regarding the author's affiliations and potential biases. While it is clear that the author is promoting a religiously-driven motivational message, there is no explicit disclosure of this bias or any affiliations that might influence the content. The mention of the author's new book, 'Greater,' suggests a potential conflict of interest, as the article could serve as a promotional tool. Transparency would be improved by clearly stating the author's intentions and possible motivations behind the article, as well as offering insight into the methodology of the 'One Word' challenge mentioned.